A New Bibliometric Index Based on the Shape of the Citation Distribution

In order to improve the h-index in terms of its accuracy and sensitivity to the form of the citation distribution, we propose the new bibliometric index . The basic idea is to define, for any author with a given number of citations, an “ideal” citation distribution which represents a benchmark in terms of number of papers and number of citations per publication, and to obtain an index which increases its value when the real citation distribution approaches its ideal form. The method is very general because the ideal distribution can be defined differently according to the main objective of the index. In this paper we propose to define it by a “squared-form” distribution: this is consistent with many popular bibliometric indices, which reach their maximum value when the distribution is basically a “square”. This approach generally rewards the more regular and reliable researchers, and it seems to be especially suitable for dealing with common situations such as applications for academic positions. To show the advantages of the -index some mathematical properties are proved and an application to real data is proposed.

[1]  Gangan Prathap,et al.  The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[2]  S. M. Ali,et al.  A General Class of Coefficients of Divergence of One Distribution from Another , 1966 .

[3]  Yang Tao,et al.  A Study on Development Planning for Management Science and Engineering , 2006 .

[4]  Alex De Visscher,et al.  What does the g-index really measure? , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  The π-index: a new indicator for assessing scientific impact , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[6]  I. Olkin,et al.  Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications , 1980 .

[7]  Chun-Ting Zhang,et al.  The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations , 2009, PloS one.

[8]  Ash Mohammad Abbas,et al.  Bounds and Inequalities Relating h-Index, g-Index, e-Index and Generalized Impact Factor: An Improvement over Existing Models , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  Leo Egghe,et al.  The Hirsch index and related impact measures , 2010, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Chun-Ting Zhang,et al.  The h’-Index, Effectively Improving the h-Index Based on the Citation Distribution , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[12]  Takumi Kongo An alternative axiomatization of the Hirsch index , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[13]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Gerhard J. Woeginger,et al.  An axiomatic analysis of Egghe's g-index , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[15]  L. Bornmann,et al.  How good is research really? , 2013, EMBO reports.

[16]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  The πv-index: a new indicator to characterize the impact of journals , 2010, Scientometrics.

[17]  Harry Joe,et al.  Majorization and divergence , 1990 .

[18]  Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti Improving a decomposition of the h-index , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  The ź-index , 2009 .

[20]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  New developments related to the Hirsch index , 2006 .

[21]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Redundancies in H Index Variants and the Proposal of the Number of Top-Cited Papers as an Attractive Indicator , 2012 .

[22]  R. Rousseau,et al.  The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index , 2007 .

[23]  Robin K. S. Hankin,et al.  Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output , 2008, Scientometrics.

[24]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Generalizing the H- and G-Indices , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[25]  Gangan Prathap,et al.  The zynergy‐index and the formula for the h‐index , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  L. Egghe An improvement of the h-index: the g-index , 2006 .

[27]  J. Hirsch An index to quantify an individual's scientific output , 2005 .