LinkMirage: Enabling Privacy-preserving Analytics on Social Relationships

Social relationships present a critical foundation for many real-world applications. However, both users and online social network (OSN) providers are hesitant to share social relationships with untrusted external applications due to privacy concerns. In this work, we design LinkMirage, a system that mediates privacy-preserving access to social relationships. LinkMirage takes users’ social relationship graph as an input, obfuscates the social graph topology, and provides untrusted external applications with an obfuscated view of the social relationship graph while preserving graph utility. Our key contributions are (1) a novel algorithm for obfuscating social relationship graph while preserving graph utility, (2) theoretical and experimental analysis of privacy and utility using real-world social network topologies, including a large-scale Google+ dataset with 940 million links. Our experimental results demonstrate that LinkMirage provides up to 10x improvement in privacy guarantees compared to the state-of-the-art approaches. Overall, LinkMirage enables the design of real-world applications such as recommendation systems, graph analytics, anonymous communications, and Sybil defenses while protecting the privacy of social relationships.

[1]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Differential Privacy , 2006, ICALP.

[2]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Ostra: Leveraging Trust to Thwart Unwanted Communication , 2008, NSDI.

[3]  Lise Getoor,et al.  Preserving the Privacy of Sensitive Relationships in Graph Data , 2007, PinKDD.

[4]  Chandra Prakash,et al.  SybilInfer: Detecting Sybil Nodes using Social Networks , 2011 .

[5]  Michael Hicks,et al.  Deanonymizing mobility traces: using social network as a side-channel , 2012, CCS.

[6]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[7]  K. Liu,et al.  Towards identity anonymization on graphs , 2008, SIGMOD Conference.

[8]  Carmela Troncoso,et al.  Protecting location privacy: optimal strategy against localization attacks , 2012, CCS.

[9]  Nick Mathewson,et al.  Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router , 2004, USENIX Security Symposium.

[10]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook , 2009, WOSN '09.

[11]  Shouling Ji,et al.  Structural Data De-anonymization: Quantification, Practice, and Implications , 2014, CCS.

[12]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Differential privacy and robust statistics , 2009, STOC '09.

[13]  Ninghui Li,et al.  Membership privacy: a unifying framework for privacy definitions , 2013, CCS.

[14]  Ming Gu,et al.  De-Anonymizing Dynamic Social Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[15]  Prateek Mittal,et al.  SecGraph: A Uniform and Open-source Evaluation System for Graph Data Anonymization and De-anonymization , 2015, USENIX Security Symposium.

[16]  Jaideep Srivastava,et al.  Impact of social influence in e-commerce decision making , 2007, ICEC.

[17]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Communities in Evolving Networks: Definitions, Detection, and Analysis Techniques , 2013 .

[18]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  The link prediction problem for social networks , 2003, CIKM '03.

[19]  Mauro Conti,et al.  SocialSpy: Browsing (Supposedly) Hidden Information in Online Social Networks , 2014, CRiSIS.

[20]  Mauro Conti,et al.  Friend in the Middle (FiM): Tackling de-anonymization in social networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops).

[21]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Identities Anonymization in Dynamic Social Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining.

[22]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  Privacy in dynamic social networks , 2010, WWW '10.

[23]  Reza Shokri,et al.  Privacy Games: Optimal User-Centric Data Obfuscation , 2014, Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol..

[24]  Xiaowei Ying,et al.  Randomizing Social Networks: a Spectrum Preserving Approach , 2008, SDM.

[25]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Siddharth Srivastava,et al.  Anonymizing Social Networks , 2007 .

[27]  Guy E. Blelloch,et al.  GraphChi: Large-Scale Graph Computation on Just a PC , 2012, OSDI.

[28]  Hal Hodson.  Google software lets you get online via your friends , 2013 .

[29]  Adam Tauman Kalai,et al.  Trust-based recommendation systems: an axiomatic approach , 2008, WWW.

[30]  Michael Kaminsky,et al.  SybilLimit: A Near-Optimal Social Network Defense against Sybil Attacks , 2008, S&P 2008.

[31]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Resisting structural re-identification in anonymized social networks , 2010, The VLDB Journal.

[33]  Jian Pei,et al.  A brief survey on anonymization techniques for privacy preserving publishing of social network data , 2008, SKDD.

[34]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[35]  Prateek Mittal,et al.  Pisces: Anonymous Communication Using Social Networks , 2013, NDSS.

[36]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  Facebook users have become much more private: A large-scale study , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[37]  Dawn Xiaodong Song,et al.  Preserving Link Privacy in Social Network Based Systems , 2012, NDSS.

[38]  Alneu de Andrade Lopes,et al.  An Ultra-Fast Modularity-Based Graph Clustering Algorithm , 2009 .

[39]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[40]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Sharing graphs using differentially private graph models , 2011, IMC '11.

[41]  Peng Gao,et al.  Exploiting Temporal Dynamics in Sybil Defenses , 2015, CCS.

[42]  Prateek Mittal,et al.  Dependence Makes You Vulnberable: Differential Privacy Under Dependent Tuples , 2016, NDSS.

[43]  Shishir Nagaraja,et al.  Anonymity in the Wild: Mixes on Unstructured Networks , 2007, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[44]  Ling Huang,et al.  Evolution of social-attribute networks: measurements, modeling, and implications using google+ , 2012, Internet Measurement Conference.

[45]  Micah Adler,et al.  Defending anonymous communications against passive logging attacks , 2003, 2003 Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2003..

[46]  Vitaly Shmatikov,et al.  De-anonymizing Social Networks , 2009, 2009 30th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.

[47]  Carmela Troncoso,et al.  Prolonging the Hide-and-Seek Game: Optimal Trajectory Privacy for Location-Based Services , 2014, WPES.

[48]  Yong-Yeol Ahn,et al.  Community-Enhanced De-anonymization of Online Social Networks , 2014, CCS.