Variation in Continuous Reaction Norms: Quantifying Directions of Biological Interest

Thermal performance curves are an example of continuous reaction norm curves of common shape. Three modes of variation in these curves—vertical shift, horizontal shift, and generalist‐specialist trade‐offs—are of special interest to evolutionary biologists. Since two of these modes are nonlinear, traditional methods such as principal components analysis fail to decompose the variation into biological modes and to quantify the variation associated with each mode. Here we present the results of a new method, template mode of variation (TMV), that decomposes the variation into predetermined modes of variation for a particular set of thermal performance curves. We illustrate the method using data on thermal sensitivity of growth rate in Pieris rapae caterpillars. The TMV model explains 67% of the variation in thermal performance curves among families; generalist‐specialist trade‐offs account for 38% of the total between‐family variation. The TMV method implemented here is applicable to both differences in mean and patterns of variation, and it can be used with either phenotypic or quantitative genetic data for thermal performance curves or other continuous reaction norms that have a template shape with a single maximum. The TMV approach may also apply to growth trajectories, age‐specific life‐history traits, and other function‐valued traits.

[1]  J. Kingsolver,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF CONTINUOUS REACTION NORMS: THERMAL SENSITIVITY OF CATERPILLAR GROWTH RATES , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  R. Lande,et al.  GENOTYPE‐ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  J. Kingsolver Feeding, Growth, and the Thermal Environment of Cabbage White Caterpillars, Pieris rapae L. , 2000, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[4]  T. Gasser,et al.  Synchronizing sample curves nonparametrically , 1999 .

[5]  Robert D. Stevenson,et al.  Integrating Thermal Physiology and Ecology of Ectotherms: A Discussion of Approaches , 1979 .

[6]  Richard Gomulkiewicz,et al.  Variation, selection and evolution of function-valued traits , 2004, Genetica.

[7]  Richard Gomulkiewicz,et al.  Environmental Variation and Selection on Performance Curves1 , 2003, Integrative and comparative biology.

[8]  E. A. Sylvestre,et al.  Self Modeling Nonlinear Regression , 1972 .

[9]  J. Ramsay,et al.  Curve registration by local regression , 2000 .

[10]  T. Gasser,et al.  Alignment of curves by dynamic time warping , 1997 .

[11]  G. Gilchrist A QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF THERMAL SENSITIVITY IN THE LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE CURVE OF APHIDIUS ERVI , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  HIERARCHICAL COMPARISON OF GENETIC VARIANCE‐COVARIANCE MATRICES. I. USING THE FLURY HIERARCHY , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  T. Gasser,et al.  Convergence and consistency results for self-modeling nonlinear regression , 1988 .

[15]  B. Walsh Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics , 2019, Handbook of Statistical Genomics.

[16]  J. D. Fry THE MIXED‐MODEL ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE APPLIED TO QUANTITATIVE GENETICS: BIOLOGICAL MEANING OF THE PARAMETERS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.

[18]  R. Huey,et al.  Evolution of thermal sensitivity of ectotherm performance. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.