Estimating benefits and costs: a case of fish passages in Lao PDR and the development of the Lower Mekong Fishway Support Tool

Fishways are often presented as a parsimonious way of assisting water infrastructure development in developing countries while preserving some ecosystem values. More specifically, fishways help preserve migratory freshwater fish species, which are often a main source of protein and other nutrients for many rural communities. To date, much of the literature regarding fishway development focuses on increasing understanding of the interaction between the fish populations and engineering interventions. Accordingly, there is limited analysis that considers fishway construction relative to the specific benefits and costs that subsequently accrue to humans. In this study we outline the development of a decision support tool designed to assist officials in the Lower Mekong evaluate the merits of constructing fishways to address barriers to fish passage. Arguably, the tool can also be modified to assess the avoided cost of building additional barriers that constrain fish migration. The Lower Mekong Fishway Support Tool (LMFST) is underpinned by economic notions and populated with input from experts involved in fishway construction. The LMFST is intended to provide indicative monetary estimates and does not replace comprehensive engineering and social analysis; rather, it guides users in assessing those locations and structures that are more likely to deliver a positive outcome for local communities. The LMFST is buttressed in benefit–cost analysis and encourages decision making to be more transparent and this is one of the major contributions of this work.

[1]  Chang‐Hoi Ho,et al.  Tropical cyclone rainfall in the Mekong River Basin for 1983–2016 , 2019, Atmospheric Research.

[2]  L. Baumgartner,et al.  Local perceptions of changes in the use and management of floodplain fisheries commons: the case of Pak Peung wetland in Lao PDR , 2019, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[3]  I. Stuart,et al.  Evaluation of cone fishways to facilitate passage of small-bodied fish , 2019 .

[4]  L. Baumgartner,et al.  Achieving fish passage outcomes at irrigation infrastructure; a case study from the Lower Mekong Basin , 2019 .

[5]  Karin Frank,et al.  Interregional flows of ecosystem services: Concepts, typology and four cases , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[6]  M. Briggs,et al.  The impact of project announcements on property values: an empirical analysis , 2015 .

[7]  L. Baumgartner,et al.  Perspective: Towards environmentally acceptable criteria for downstream fish passage through mini hydro and irrigation infrastructure in the Lower Mekong River Basin , 2014 .

[8]  A. Dehnhardt Decision-makers’ attitudes towards economic valuation – a case study of German water management authorities , 2013 .

[9]  L. Baumgartner,et al.  Lock gates improve passage of small-bodied fish and crustaceans in a low gradient vertical-slot fishway , 2008 .

[10]  I. Stuart,et al.  Optimising Denil fishways for passage of small and large fishes , 2007 .

[11]  D. Pearce,et al.  Cost?Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy , 1998 .