A Value-Centric Model to Ground Norms and Requirements for ePartners of Children

Children as they grow up start to discover their neighborhood and surrounding areas and get increasingly involved in social interaction. We aim to support this process through a system of so-called electronic partners (ePartners) that function as teammates to their users. These ePartners should adapt their behavior to norms that govern the social contexts (e.g., the family or school) in which they are functioning. We argue that the envisaged normative framework for ePartners for children should be based on an understanding of the target domain that is grounded in user studies. It is the aim of this paper to provide such understanding, in particular answering the following questions: (1) what are the main elements that make up the social context of the target domain (family life), and how are they related?, and (2) what are the relationships between these elements of the social context and the normative framework in which we envision the ePartners to operate? To answer these questions we conducted focus groups sessions and a cultural probe study with parents and children. The transcripts from these sessions were analyzed using grounded theory, which has resulted in a grounded model that shows that (1) activities, concerns, and limitations related to family life are the main elements of the social context of this user group, and that all three elements are connected through the central concept of user values, and (2) norms can support these values by promoting activities, alleviating concerns and overcoming limitations. In this way the model provides the foundation for developing a normative framework to govern the behavior of ePartners for children, identifying user values as the starting point.

[1]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Social Adaptation - When Software Gives Users a Voice , 2012, ENASE.

[2]  Daniela Fogli,et al.  Knowledge-centered design of decision support systems for emergency management , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Tjerk de Greef,et al.  Adaptive Automation in a Naval Combat Management System , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[4]  P. H. Kahn,et al.  Human values, ethics, and design , 2002 .

[5]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Normative Multi-Agent Systems , 2013, Normative Multi-Agent Systems.

[6]  Michael Luck,et al.  A normative framework for agent-based systems , 2006, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[7]  Kathleen M. MacQueen,et al.  Handbook for Team-Based Qualitative Research , 2007 .

[8]  Andrew Sears and Julie A. Jacko The human-computer interaction handbook , 2013 .

[9]  Bonnie B. Armbruster,et al.  Center for the Study of Reading , 1987 .

[10]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Playful Probing: Making Probing More Fun , 2007, INTERACT.

[11]  H. Bernard Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1988 .

[12]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  KAoS: A Policy and Domain Services Framework for Grid Computing and Semantic Web Services , 2004, iTrust.

[13]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[14]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  Translating Values into Design Requirements , 2013 .

[15]  C. Breazeal,et al.  Social robots: beyond tools to partners , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[16]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .

[17]  R J Terbijhe,et al.  [Norms and values]. , 2003, Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde.

[18]  Olivier Boissier,et al.  From Organisation Specification to Normative Programming in Multi-Agent Organisations , 2010, CLIMA.

[19]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[20]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[21]  Javier Vázquez-Salceda,et al.  Modelling Electronic Organizations , 2003, CEEMAS.

[22]  M. Rokeach The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[23]  Karen L. Myers,et al.  A Cognitive Framework for Delegation to an Assistive User Agent , 2005 .

[24]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Trends in the living room and beyond: results from ethnographic studies using creative and playful probing , 2008, CIE.

[25]  Tjerk de Greef ePartners for Dynamic Task Allocation and Coordination , 2012 .

[26]  K. Punch Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches , 2008 .

[27]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[28]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[29]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[30]  Neerincx,et al.  Situated cognitive engineering for complex task environments , 2005 .

[31]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering: New Wine in New Bottles , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[32]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[33]  Olivier Boissier,et al.  Developing organised multiagent systems using the MOISE+ model: programming issues at the system and agent levels , 2007, Int. J. Agent Oriented Softw. Eng..

[34]  Koen V. Hindriks,et al.  The icat as a natural interaction partner: playing go fish with a robot , 2011, AAMAS'11.

[35]  Willem-Paul Brinkman,et al.  An Explorative Study into a Tele-delivered Multi Patient Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy System , 2010 .

[36]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Directed Cultural Probes: Detecting Barriers in the Usage of Public Transportation , 2011, INTERACT.

[37]  Viviane Torres da Silva,et al.  An Algorithm to Identify Conflicts Between Norms and Values , 2013, COIN@AAMAS/PRIMA.

[38]  C. van der Mast,et al.  An online lifestyle diary with a persuasive computer assistant providing feedback on self-management. , 2009, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[39]  T. Ormerod,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making and Macrocognition , 2012 .

[40]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[41]  M. V. Dignum,et al.  A Model for Organizational Interaction: based on Agents, founded in Logic , 2000 .