Explaining Emergence and Consequences of Specific Formal Controls in IS Outsourcing -- A Process-View

IS outsourcing projects often fail to achieve project goals. To inhibit this failure, managers need to design formal controls that are tailored to the specific contextual demands. However, the dynamic and uncertain nature of IS outsourcing projects makes the design of such specific formal controls at the outset of a project challenging. Hence, the process of translating high-level project goals into specific formal controls becomes crucial for success or failure of IS outsourcing projects. Based on a comparative case study of four IS outsourcing projects, our study enhances current understanding of such translation processes and their consequences by developing a process model that explains the success or failure to achieve high-level project goals as an outcome of two unique translation patterns. This novel process-based explanation for how and why IS outsourcing projects succeed or fail has important implications for control theory and IS project escalation literature.

[1]  William R. King,et al.  Predictors of Formal Control Usage in IT Outsourcing Partnerships , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Mike Newman,et al.  Control, trust, power, and the dynamics of information system outsourcing relationships: A process study of contractual software development , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Balancing and Rebalancing in the Creation and Evolution of Organizational Control , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches , 1985 .

[7]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Performance Evaluation Metrics for Information Systems Development: A Principal-Agent Model , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  J. Barker Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[9]  V. G. Ouchi,et al.  A conceptual framework for the design and organizational control mechanisms , 1979 .

[10]  C. Gersick REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[11]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Amy E. Dunbar,et al.  The Outsourcing of Corporate Tax Function Activities , 2001 .

[13]  Roman Beck,et al.  Control Balancing in Information Systems Development Offshoring Projects , 2013, MIS Q..

[14]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[15]  Kishore Sengupta,et al.  The Impact of Goals On Software Project Management: An Experimental Investigation , 1999, MIS Q..

[16]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Evolution toward Fit , 2002 .

[17]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[18]  Mark Keil,et al.  The Effect of an Initial Budget and Schedule Goal on Software Project Escalation , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Jens Dibbern,et al.  Explaining Variations in Client Extra Costs Between Software Projects Offshored to India , 2008, MIS Q..

[20]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Systems Development Ambidexterity: Explaining the Complementary and Substitutive Roles of Formal and Informal Controls , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  O. Williamson Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[22]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[23]  B. Looy,et al.  Toward An Integrative Perspective on Alliance Governance: Connecting Contract Design, Trust Dynamics, and Contract Application , 2008 .

[24]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Contextual influences on self-control of is professionals engaged in systems development , 1996 .

[25]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[26]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[27]  Markus C. Becker Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[28]  L. Kirsch The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[29]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Control in Internal and Outsourced Software Projects , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..