The ‘Centre Effect’ in Nephrology: What Do Differences between Nephrology Centres Tell Us about Clinical Performance in Patient Management?

Improving the quality of care provided by nephrology centres to patients with kidney disease requires a clear understanding of how to compare performance after adjustment for case mix, combined with a detailed understanding of the structure and processes that are associated with the achievement of good clinical results. In this review, we discuss how to measure quality of care (using process or outcome measures), how to take case mix into account, how best to display comparisons between nephrology centres, and how to study the causes of real variations in quality between centres. This is a narrative review; we include examples from other fields in which the centre effect has been studied, including education.

[1]  T. Feest,et al.  UK Renal Registry Report 2002 , 2004 .

[2]  M. Zhan,et al.  Center effects in anemia management of dialysis patients. , 2007, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[3]  Tom Marshall,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of league tables and control charts as aids to health service decision-making. , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[4]  Jon Nicholl,et al.  Case-mix adjustment in non-randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy , 2007, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[5]  J C Fink,et al.  Within-center correlation in dialysis adequacy. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Multilevel Modelling of Health Statistics , 2002, Technometrics.

[7]  R. Lilford,et al.  What is the empirical evidence that hospitals with higher-risk adjusted mortality rates provide poorer quality care? A systematic review of the literature , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.

[8]  Richard Lilford,et al.  Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma , 2004, The Lancet.

[9]  W. McClellan,et al.  A randomized evaluation of two health care quality improvement program (HCQIP) interventions to improve the adequacy of hemodialysis care of ESRD patients: feedback alone versus intensive intervention. , 2004, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[10]  N. Brooks,et al.  Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25 730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over eight years , 2007, Heart.

[11]  T. Perneger,et al.  Variability in quality of care among dialysis units in western Switzerland. , 2005, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[12]  Roger Bolus,et al.  Identifying best practices in dialysis care: results of cognitive interviews and a national survey of dialysis providers. , 2008, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[13]  A. Driver.  New Publication: APHOs second in the series of technical briefings on Statistical process control methods in public health intelligence. , 2008 .

[14]  M. Chassin,et al.  Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery. , 2002, Health affairs.

[15]  L. Szczech,et al.  Associations between CMS's Clinical Performance Measures project benchmarks, profit structure, and mortality in dialysis units. , 2006, Kidney international.

[16]  S. Fukuhara,et al.  Nonadherence in hemodialysis: associations with mortality, hospitalization, and practice patterns in the DOPPS. , 2003, Kidney international.

[17]  S. Day,et al.  The population mean predicts the number of deviant individuals. , 1990, BMJ.

[18]  M. Rocco,et al.  Relationship between Clinical Performance Measures and Outcomes among Patients Receiving Long-Term Hemodialysis , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  N. Powe,et al.  Frequency of patient-physician contact in chronic kidney disease care and achievement of clinical performance targets. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[20]  Josef Coresh,et al.  Frequency of sit-down patient care rounds, attainment of clinical performance targets, hospitalization, and mortality in hemodialysis patients. , 2004, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[21]  M. Zhan,et al.  Measuring the efficacy of a quality improvement program in dialysis adequacy with changes in center effects. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[22]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  League Tables and Their Limitations: Statistical Issues in Comparisons of Institutional Performance , 1996 .

[23]  Azeem Majeed,et al.  Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Jonathan R Sugarman,et al.  Developing clinical performance measures based on the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines: process, outcomes, and implications. , 2003, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[25]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Julian Flowers Apho.  Statistical process control methods in public health intelligence. Technical briefing 2 , 2007 .

[27]  G. Eknoyan,et al.  Improving outcomes for dialysis patients in the international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. , 2006, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[28]  M Susser,et al.  Choosing a future for epidemiology: II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[29]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2002, JAMA.

[30]  C. Tomson,et al.  UK Renal Registry 11th Annual Report (December 2008): Chapter 15 The UK Renal Registry, UKRR database, validation and methodology , 2009, Nephron Clinical Practice.