More and more international companies use physical space as a way to enhance creativity, create change and stimulate interaction among employees (Kristensen 2004; Doorley and Witthoft 2012). Research has shown that there is a strong link between work practice, learning and innovation in organisations (Brown & Duguid 1991). This importance to investigate space and spatial arrangements with focus on change in the organisation and the learning environment in the organisation has also been seen in the educational sector (Oblinger, 2006; Nussbaumer, 2014). One of the recent examples in the educational sector using this approach is the University of Southern Denmark (SDU) in Kolding. During the summer of 2014, the university has been relocated to a new Campus Kolding (www.sdu.dk). One of the departments at campus Kolding is the Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship Management (IER). The employees of IER used the relocation to the new campus as an opportunity to strengthen the IER profile and create change in the organisation through developing new educational tracks, generating new ways of teaching and collaborating with internal as well as external partners: companies, educational institutions and the municipality in Kolding. We will use IER as a case to investigate how space can support a change in the organisation, generate interaction and support new relations. The theoretical framing is from change management, organisational and design literature. Our findings demonstrate how an organisational change has taken place at the new campus and how the space supported the changes and affected
[1]
Roberto J. Rengel.
The Interior Plan: Concepts and Exercises
,
2011
.
[2]
J. Brown,et al.
Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation
,
1991
.
[3]
Chris Argyris,et al.
Action science and organizational learning
,
1995
.
[4]
J. March.
Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning
,
1991,
STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.
[5]
Francis Duffy,et al.
New Environments for Working
,
1998
.
[6]
Majken Schultz,et al.
Taking Brand Initiative: How Companies Can Align Strategy, Culture, and Identity Through Corporate Branding
,
2008
.
[7]
Mooweon Rhee,et al.
Exploration and Exploitation
,
2016
.
[8]
Roberto J. Rengel.
Shaping Interior Space
,
2002
.
[9]
Tore Kristensen,et al.
The Physical Context of Creativity
,
2004
.
[10]
Majken Schultz,et al.
The Dynamics of Organizational Identity
,
2002
.
[11]
Scott Witthoft,et al.
Make Space: How to Set the Stage for Creative Collaboration
,
2011
.
[12]
D. Campbell.
III. “Degrees of Freedom” and the Case Study
,
1975
.
[13]
Drew Plunkett,et al.
Detail in Contemporary Office Design
,
2014
.
[14]
R. Stacey.
Learning as an activity of interdependent people
,
2003
.
[15]
Mark Easterby-Smith,et al.
Organizational learning: current debates and opportunities
,
1999
.