Interactive use of on-line portal imaging in pelvic radiation.

We have evaluated a fluoroscopic on-line portal imaging system in routine clinical radiotherapy, involving the treatment of 566 pelvic fields on 13 patients. The image was typically generated by delivering a radiation dose of 6-8 cGy. Comparison between portal image and simulator film was done by eye and all visible errors were corrected before continuing irradiation. If possible, these corrections were performed from outside the treatment room by moving the patient couch by remote control or by changing collimator parameters. Adjustments were performed on 289/530 (54.5%) evaluable fields or 229/278 (82.4%) evaluable patient set-ups. The lateral couch position was most frequently adjusted (n = 254). The absolute values of the adjustments were 6.8 mm mean (SD 6.6 mm) with a maximum of 40 mm. All absolute values of adjustments exceeding 25 mm were recorded in one patient and those exceeding 15 mm were observed in two patients. Both patients were obese females. Adjustments exceeding 5 mm were observed in all 13 patients. Related to the use of on-line portal imaging, treatment time was increased by a median of 36.5% (mean 45.8%; SD 42.1%). The range was 7.7 to 442%. The fraction of the total treatment time to perform corrections was 22.7% median (mean: 26.0; SD: 11.8%). Statistically significant systematic in-plane errors were found in 7/13 patients. A systematic error was detected on the lateral position of the field in five patients. In one patient a systematic error of the longitudinal field position and in one patient a rotational error was detected. For adjustments in the lateral direction the present method does not allow to detect lateral shifts of less than 2 mm. For adjustments in the longitudinal direction the sensitivity could not be estimated but the available data suggest that 80% of errors < or = 5 mm were not adjusted. In obese patients, random errors may be surprisingly large.

[1]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Relations of image quality in on-line portal images and patient individual parameters for pelvic field radiotherapy , 1992 .

[2]  K W Leszczynski,et al.  An adaptive technique for digital noise suppression in on-line portal imaging. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  L. Reinstein,et al.  Assessment of geometric treatment accuracy using time-lapse on-line portal imaging , 1990 .

[4]  P. Munro,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a fluoroscopic imaging device for radiotherapy localizaton , 1990 .

[5]  M W Vannier,et al.  A method to analyze 2-dimensional daily radiotherapy portal images from an on-line fiber-optic imaging system. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J. W. Epstein,et al.  On-line radiotherapy imaging with an array of fiber-optic image reducers. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  M van Herk,et al.  First clinical experience with a newly developed electronic portal imaging device. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  M Coghe,et al.  Routine clinical on-line portal imaging followed by immediate field adjustment using a tele-controlled patient couch. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  G. A. Ferguson,et al.  Statistical analysis in psychology and education , 1960 .

[10]  Shlomo Shalev,et al.  Digital video system for on-line portal verification , 1990, Medical Imaging.