Physics‐Informed Neural Network for Nonlinear Dynamics in Fiber Optics

A physics-informed neural network (PINN) that combines deep learning with physics is studied to solve the nonlinear Schrödinger equation for learning nonlinear dynamics in fiber optics. We carry out a systematic investigation and comprehensive verification on PINN for multiple physical effects in optical fibers, including dispersion, self-phase modulation, and higher-order nonlinear effects. Moreover, both special case (soliton propagation) and general case (multi-pulse propagation) are investigated and realized with PINN. In the previous studies, the PINN was mainly effective for single scenario. To overcome this problem, the physical parameters (pulse peak power and amplitudes of sub-pulses) are hereby embedded as additional input parameter controllers, which allow PINN to learn the physical constraints of different scenarios and perform good generalizability. Furthermore, PINN exhibits better performance than the data-driven neural network using much less data, and its computational complexity (in terms of number of multiplications) is much lower than that of the split-step Fourier method. The results report here show that the PINN is not only an effective partial differential equation solver, but also a prospective technique to advance the scientific computing and automatic modeling in fiber optics.

[1]  Bernhard Spinnler,et al.  Equalizer Design and Complexity for Digital Coherent Receivers , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[2]  Nevio Benvenuto,et al.  Algorithms for Communications Systems and their Applications , 2021 .

[3]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Modeling of nonlinear system based on deep learning framework , 2016 .

[4]  M. Stein Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling , 1987 .

[5]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Predicting ultrafast nonlinear dynamics in fibre optics with a recurrent neural network , 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Xue Chen,et al.  Data-driven Optical Fiber Channel Modeling: A Deep Learning Approach , 2020, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[7]  R. Noll Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence , 1976 .

[8]  L. Dal Negro,et al.  Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in nano-optics and metamaterials. , 2019, Optics express.

[9]  Arinan Dourado,et al.  Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Missing Physics Estimation in Cumulative Damage Models: A Case Study in Corrosion Fatigue , 2020, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[10]  Navid Zobeiry,et al.  A Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approach for Solving Heat Transfer Equation in Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering Applications , 2020, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[11]  Christophe Finot,et al.  Artificial neural networks for nonlinear pulse shaping in optical fibers , 2020 .

[12]  Christophe Finot,et al.  Theory of parabolic pulse propagation in nonlinear dispersion-decreasing optical fiber amplifiers , 2008 .

[13]  Maxim Kuschnerov,et al.  Reduced Complexity Digital Back-Propagation Methods for Optical Communication Systems , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[14]  Paris Perdikaris,et al.  Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[15]  Jun Li,et al.  Solving localized wave solutions of the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation using an improved PINN method , 2021, Nonlinear Dynamics.

[16]  Steven L. Brunton,et al.  Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamics , 2017, Nature Communications.

[17]  V. Karpman Self-modulation of Nonlinear Plane Waves in Dispersive Media , 1967 .

[18]  William K. Bischel,et al.  Numerical studies of the interplay between self‐phase modulation and dispersion for intense plane‐wave laser pulses , 1975 .

[19]  D. Shanno Conditioning of Quasi-Newton Methods for Function Minimization , 1970 .

[20]  George Em Karniadakis,et al.  Learning in Modal Space: Solving Time-Dependent Stochastic PDEs Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks , 2019, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[21]  L. Chua,et al.  Methods of qualitative theory in nonlinear dynamics , 1998 .

[22]  Charles H. Townes,et al.  Self-steepening of light pulses. , 1967 .

[23]  内田 淳史 Optical communication with chaotic lasers : applications of nonlinear dynamics and synchronization , 2012 .

[24]  George Em Karniadakis,et al.  Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations , 2020, Science.

[25]  Ebrahim Esmailzadeh,et al.  Elastic and viscoelastic foundations: a review on linear and nonlinear vibration modeling and applications , 2019, Nonlinear Dynamics.

[26]  John M. Dudley,et al.  Modelling self-similar parabolic pulses in optical fibres with a neural network , 2020 .

[27]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey , 2015, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[28]  Keith J. Blow,et al.  Theoretical description of transient stimulated Raman scattering in optical fibers , 1989 .

[29]  Govind P. Agrawal,et al.  Nonlinear Fiber Optics , 1989 .

[30]  J. Nathan Kutz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics of Mode-locking Optical Fiber Ring Lasers , 2002 .

[31]  A. Lau,et al.  Solving the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation in Optical Fibers Using Physics-informed Neural Network , 2021, 2021 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[32]  G. Karniadakis,et al.  Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Heat Transfer Problems , 2021, Journal of Heat Transfer.

[33]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization , 1989, Math. Program..

[34]  F. Calogero Ground State of a One‐Dimensional N‐Body System , 1969 .

[35]  M. Sciamanna,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of a laser diode with an injection of an optical frequency comb. , 2020, Optics express.