Reliability of Tuffier's Line as an Anatomic Landmark

Study Design. The level of Tuffier's line was assessed on 200 standing and 60 prone lumbar radiographs. Sex, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were correlated with the radiograph findings. Objective. To determine whether the level of Tuffier's line is associated with sex, height, weight, or BMI. Summary of Background Data. Tuffier's line (intercristal line) is a commonly used landmark for identification of the L4–L5 interspace; however, multiple studies have identified that this landmark is unreliable. Methods. The level of Tuffier's line was assessed retrospectively on 200 standing anteroposterior lumbar radiographs and correlated with sex. Prospectively, the level of Tuffier's line was assessed on 60 prone posteroanterior lumbar radiographs and correlated with sex, height, weight, and BMI. Results. In men, the intercristal line most often intersected the L4 body or inferior endplate. In women, the intercristal line most often intersected the L5 body or superior endplate. Weight and BMI had no correlation with Tuffier's line. Subjects with a Tuffier's line through L4 were taller than those with a Tuffier's line through L5. Conclusion. Tuffier's line demonstrated predictable sex-related differences: men had an intercristal line that most often intersected the L4 body or inferior endplate whereas the women's intercristal line most often intersected the L5 body or superior endplate. However, because the actual level of Tuffier's line may vary from the L4 body to the L5 body, the intercristal line is insufficient to use as the sole landmark for assessing spinal segmental level.

[1]  Martin H. Dauber,et al.  Miller’s Anesthesia , 2010 .

[2]  Young Jin Ko,et al.  Interexaminer reliability and accuracy of posterior superior iliac spine and iliac crest palpation for spinal level estimations. , 2007, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[3]  Geoffrey H. Sperber,et al.  Clinically Oriented Anatomy , 2006 .

[4]  G. Matsumura,et al.  Establishing intercrestal line by posture:--a radiographic evaluation. , 2006, Okajimas folia anatomica Japonica.

[5]  G. Malanga,et al.  Musculoskeletal Physical Examination: An Evidence-Based Approach , 2005 .

[6]  C. Jung,et al.  The tenth rib line as a new landmark of the lumbar vertebral level during spinal block , 2004, Anaesthesia.

[7]  J. Bahk,et al.  Influence of Age and Sex on the Position of the Conus Medullaris and Tuffier's Line in Adults , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[8]  C C Wright,et al.  Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation. , 2003, Manual therapy.

[9]  G. Strichartz,et al.  The Critical Role of Concentration for Lidocaine Block of Peripheral Nerve In Vivo: Studies of Function and Drug Uptake in the Rat , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[10]  G Furness,et al.  An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identificationof lumbar intervertebral level , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[11]  F. Spring,et al.  Intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliability of a positional diagnostic screen for the lumbar spine , 2001 .

[12]  D. Wilson,et al.  Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[13]  N. Taylor,et al.  Manipulative physiotherapists can reliably palpate nominated lumbar spinal levels. , 1999, Manual therapy.

[14]  C. Render The reproducibility of the iliac crest as a marker of lumbar spine level , 1996, Anaesthesia.

[15]  Q. Hogan Tuffier's line: the normal distribution of anatomic parameters. , 1994, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  A. Forster,et al.  Continuous spinal anesthesia: where do spinal catheters go? , 1993, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[17]  S. Schiowitz,et al.  An Osteopathic Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment , 1991 .

[18]  F. Ievins Accuracy of placement of extradural needles in the L3-4 interspace: comparison of two methods of identifying L4. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[19]  D C Patterson,et al.  Musculoskeletal examination. , 1984, Occupational health nursing.

[20]  Quinnell Rc,et al.  The use of in vivo lumbar discography to assess the clinical significance of the position of the intercrestal line. , 1983 .

[21]  H. Stockdale,et al.  The Use of In Vivo Lumbar Discography to Assess the Clinical Significance of the Position of the Intercrestal Line , 1983, Spine.

[22]  B. MacGibbon,et al.  A Radiologic Survey of Various Configurations of the Lumbar Spine , 1979, Spine.

[23]  G. Romanes CUNNINGHAM'S MANUAL OF PRACTICAL ANATOMY , 1986, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[24]  M. Willman Radiographic technical aspects of the postural study. , 1977, The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

[25]  S. Hoppenfeld,et al.  Physical examination of the spine and extremities , 1976 .

[26]  Édition,et al.  CUNNINGHAM'S MANUAL OF PRACTICAL ANATOMY , 1958, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[27]  A. Wentworth Some Experimental Work on Lumbar Puncture of the Subarachnoid Space , 1896 .