Apparent Opacity Affects Perception of Structure from Motion and Stereo

Abstract : It is well known that the human visual system can reconstruct depth from simple random-dot displays given motion information. This fact has lent support to the notion that structure from stereo and motion systems rely on low-level primitives or tokens, such as edges, derived from image intensities. In contrast, the judgment of surface attributes such as transparency or opacity is often considered to be a higher level visual process that would make use of low-level stereo or motion information, and perhaps attention or later recognition to tease apart the transparent from the opaque parts. This is exemplified by the lack of computational studies dealing with transparency, compared with the at least limited success of a number of algorithms to solve structure from motion or stereo. In this study, the authors describe a new illusion and some results that question the above view by showing that depth from transparency and opacity can override the rigidity bias in perceiving depth from motion. This provides support for the idea that the brain's computation of the surface material attribute of transparency may have to be done either before, or in parallel with, the computation of structure from motion.

[1]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  The perception of transparency with achromatic colors , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. A. Anderson,et al.  A neural network model of multistable perception. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[3]  T Poggio,et al.  Parallel integration of vision modules. , 1988, Science.

[4]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Subjective contours capture stereopsis , 1985, Nature.

[5]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  INTERACTION OF DIFFERENT MODULES IN DEPTH PERCEPTION. , 1987, ICCV 1987.

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[7]  E. Land,et al.  Lightness and retinex theory. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  Berthold K. P. Horn Obtaining shape from shading information , 1989 .

[9]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[10]  F Metelli,et al.  The perception of transparency. , 1974, Scientific American.

[11]  K Nakayama,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects , 1989, Perception.

[12]  J. P. Cavanagh,et al.  Reconstructing the third dimension: Interactions between color, texture, motion, binocular disparity, and shape , 1987, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[13]  E H Land,et al.  COLOR VISION AND THE NATURAL IMAGE PART II. , 1959, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Daphna Weinshall,et al.  The MIT vision machine , 1988 .

[15]  S. Zeki Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey , 1978, Nature.

[16]  Whitman Richards,et al.  How to Play Twenty Questions with Nature and Win , 1982 .

[17]  G. Sperling,et al.  Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure , 1986, Vision Research.

[18]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  Ernst Mach,et al.  The Analysis of Sensations. , 1916 .

[20]  H. Barrow,et al.  RECOVERING INTRINSIC SCENE CHARACTERISTICS FROM IMAGES , 1978 .

[21]  T. D. Albright,et al.  Transparency and coherence in human motion perception , 1990, Nature.

[22]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Mechanisms of Attention. , 1978 .

[23]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  James J. Little,et al.  Seeing in Parallel: the Vision Machine , 1988 .