Simulating Ballast Shear Strength from Large-Scale Triaxial Tests

The railroad ballast layer consists of discrete aggregate particles, and the discrete element method (DEM) is the most widely adopted numerical method to simulate the particulate nature of ballast materials and their particle interactions. Large-scale triaxial tests performed in the laboratory under controlled monotonic and repeated loading conditions are commonly considered the best means to measure macroscopic mechanical properties of ballast materials, such as strength, modulus, and deformation characteristics, directly related to load-carrying and drainage functions of the ballast layer in the field. A DEM modeling approach is described for railroad ballast with realistic particle shapes developed from image analysis to simulate large-scale triaxial compression tests on a limestone ballast material. The ballast DEM model captures the strength behavior from both the traditional slow and the rapid shear loading rate types of monotonic triaxial compression tests. The results of the experimental study indicated that the shearing rate had insignificant influence on the results of the triaxial compression tests. The results also showed that the incremental displacement approach captured the measured shearing response, yet could save significant computational resources and time. This study shows that the DEM simulation approach combined with image analysis has the potential to be a quantitative tool to predict ballast performance.

[1]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  AREMA Gradations Affecting Ballast Performance Using Discrete Element Modeling (DEM) Approach , 2009 .

[2]  Y. Hashash,et al.  Aggregate Shape Effects on Ballast Tamping and Railroad Track Lateral Stability , 2006 .

[3]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Study of Railway Ballast Behavior under Cyclic Loading , 2010 .

[4]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Laboratory Characterization of Coal Dust Fouled Ballast Behavior , 2008 .

[5]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Static and Cyclic Triaxial Testing of Ballast and Subballast , 2005 .

[6]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Three-dimensional discrete element method for granular materials , 1990 .

[7]  Marshall R. Thompson,et al.  Triaxial Characterization of Minnesota Road Research Project Granular Materials , 1997 .

[8]  Y. Hashash,et al.  Simulation of triaxial compression tests with polyhedral discrete elements , 2012 .

[9]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Discrete Element Modeling of Railroad Ballast Settlement , 2007 .

[10]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Three‐dimensional discrete element simulation for granular materials , 2006 .

[11]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Field Validated Discrete Element Model for Railroad Ballast , 2011 .

[12]  Glenn R. McDowell,et al.  Discrete element modelling of railway ballast under monotonic and cyclic triaxial loading , 2010 .

[13]  M. Oda,et al.  Micro-Deformation Mechanism of Shear Banding Process Based on Modified Distinct Element Method , 1999 .

[14]  Fulvio Tonon,et al.  Modeling Triaxial Test on Intact Rock Using Discrete Element Method with Membrane Boundary , 2009 .

[15]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Shortest link method for contact detection in discrete element method , 2006 .

[16]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Discrete Element Modeling for fouled railroad ballast , 2011 .

[17]  Jean-Pierre Bardet,et al.  Observations on the effects of particle rotations on the failure of idealized granular materials , 1994 .

[18]  G. McDowell,et al.  Cyclic loading of railway ballast under triaxial conditions and in a railway test facility , 2009 .

[19]  Tecnica American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association , 2012 .

[20]  Rimantas Kačianauskas,et al.  COMPACTING OF PARTICLES FOR BIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST BY THE DISCRETE ELEMENT METHOD , 2006 .

[21]  William F. Anderson,et al.  Behavior of Railroad Ballast under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading , 2008 .