Evaluation of the AMIP soil moisture simulations

Abstract The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) conducted simulations by 30 different atmospheric general circulation models forced by observed sea surface temperatures for the 10-year period, 1979–1988. These models include a variety of different soil moisture parameterizations which influence their simulations of the entire land surface hydrology, including evaporation, soil moisture, and runoff, and their simulations of the energy balance at the surface. Here we compare these parameterizations, and evaluate their simulations of soil moisture by comparing them with actual observations of soil moisture, literally ground truth. We compared model-generated `data sets' and simulations of soil moisture with observations from 150 stations in the former Soviet Union for 1979–1985 and Illinois for 1981–1988. The spatial patterns, mean annual cycles, and interannual variations were compared to plant-available soil moisture in the upper 1 m of soil. The model-generated `data sets' are quite different from the observations, and from each other in many regions, even though they use the same bucket model calculation method. The AMIP model simulations are also quite different from each other, especially in the tropics. Models with 15-cm field capacities do not capture the observed large high latitude values of soil moisture. In addition, none of the models properly simulate winter soil moisture variations in high latitudes, keeping soil moisture constant, while observations show that soil moisture varies in the winter as much as in other seasons. The observed interannual variations of soil moisture were not captured by any of the AMIP models. Several models have large soil moisture trends during the first year or two of the AMIP simulations, with potentially large impacts on global hydrological cycle trends and on other climate elements. This is because the simulations were begun without spinning up the soil moisture to the model climatology. The length of time it took for each to reach equilibrium depended on the particular parameterization. Although observed temporal autocorrelation time scales are a few months, some models had much longer time scales than that. In particular, the three parameterizations based on the Simple Biosphere model (SiB) had trends in some regions for virtually the entire AMIP simulation period.

[1]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Biosphere-atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) for the NCAR Community Climate Model , 1986 .

[2]  S. Manabe,et al.  Summer dryness due to an increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration , 1981 .

[3]  Yongkang Xue,et al.  SSiB and its sensitivity to soil properties-A case study using HAPEX-Mobilhy data , 1996 .

[4]  Scott A. Isard,et al.  A Soil Moisture Climatology of Illinois , 1994 .

[5]  T. Phillips,et al.  A summary documentation of the AMIP models , 1994 .

[6]  A. Pitman,et al.  Simulation of freeze‐thaw cycles in a general circulation model land surface scheme , 1998 .

[7]  R. Moss,et al.  Climate change 1995 - impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change : scientific-technical analyses , 1997 .

[8]  G. Vachaud,et al.  Temporal Stability of Spatially Measured Soil Water Probability Density Function , 1985 .

[9]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[10]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1993 .

[11]  Glen E. Liston,et al.  Design of a global soil moisture initialization procedure for the simple biosphere model , 1993 .

[12]  Siegfried D. Schubert,et al.  Estimates of monthly mean soil moisture for 1979-1989 , 1992 .

[13]  Comparing the scatter in PILPS off-line experiments with that in AMIP I coupled experiments , 1998 .

[14]  C. W. Thornthwaite.  An approach toward a rational classification of climate. , 1948 .

[15]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Evapotranspiration models with canopy resistance for use in climate models, a review , 1991 .

[16]  Y. Mintz,et al.  A global monthly climatology of soil moisture and water balance , 1992 .

[17]  C. E. Desborough,et al.  The Impact of Root Weighting on the Response of Transpiration to Moisture Stress in Land Surface Schemes , 1997 .

[18]  A. Robock,et al.  Surface Air Temperature Simulations by AMIP General Circulation Models: Volcanic and ENSO Signals and Systematic Errors , 1998 .

[19]  J. Namias.  Some Empirical Evidence for the Influence of Snow Cover on Temperature and Precipitation , 1985 .

[20]  Dynamically Stratified Monte Carlo Forecasting , 1992 .

[21]  A. Robock,et al.  Reply: (Evaluation of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes Using Observations) , 1997 .

[22]  H. Giordani,et al.  The Land Surface Scheme ISBA within the Météo-France Climate Model ARPEGE. Part I. Implementation and Preliminary Results , 1995 .

[23]  S. Planton,et al.  A Simple Parameterization of Land Surface Processes for Meteorological Models , 1989 .

[24]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1995 .

[25]  C. Justice,et al.  A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for GCMs. Part III: The greening of the Colorado State University general circulation model , 1996 .

[26]  Jean-François Mahfouf,et al.  A new snow parameterization for the Météo-France climate model: Part I: validation in stand-alone experiments , 1995 .

[27]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Soil moisture: A critical focus for global change studies , 1996 .

[28]  H. Matsuyama,et al.  Estimates of continental-scale soil wetness and comparison with the soil moisture data of Mintz and Serafini , 1997 .

[29]  C. Schlosser.  Land-Surface Hydrology: Validation and Intercomparison of Multi-Year Off-Line Simulations Using Midlatitude Data , 1995 .

[30]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[31]  J. Royer,et al.  A new snow parameterization for the M 6 t 6 o-France climate model Part II : validation in a 3-D GCM experiment , 2022 .

[32]  Piers J. Sellers,et al.  A Simplified Biosphere Model for Global Climate Studies , 1991 .

[33]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Sensitivity of Latent Heat Flux from PILPS Land-Surface Schemes to Perturbations of Surface Air Temperature , 1998 .

[34]  Pedro Viterbo,et al.  An Improved Land Surface Parameterization Scheme in the ECMWF Model and Its Validation. , 1995 .

[35]  A. Dalcher,et al.  A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for Use within General Circulation Models , 1986 .

[36]  S. Manabe.  CLIMATE AND THE OCEAN CIRCULATION1 , 1969 .

[37]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Validation of the Snow Submodel of the Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme with Russian Snow Cover and Meteorological Observational Data , 1997 .

[38]  Y. Xue,et al.  18-Year Land-Surface Hydrology Model Simulations for a Midlatitude Grassland Catchment in Valdai, Russia , 1997 .

[39]  Evaluation of Total Cloudiness and Its Variability in the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project , 1995 .

[40]  A. Robock,et al.  Scales of temporal and spatial variability of midlatitude soil moisture , 1996 .

[41]  D. Mocko,et al.  Comparison of a Land Surface Model (SSiB) to Three Parameterizations of Evapotranspiration—A Study Based on ISLSCP Initiative I Data , 1998 .

[42]  L. Jaeger,et al.  Monatskarten des Niederschlags für die ganze Erde , 1976 .

[43]  A. Henderson‐sellers,et al.  Validation of soil moisture simulation in landsurface parameterisation schemes with HAPEX data , 1996 .

[44]  K. Vinnikov,et al.  Soil Moisture: Empirical Data and Model Results. , 1991 .

[45]  A. Pitman,et al.  The validation of a snow parameterization designed for use in general circulation models , 1998 .

[46]  H. Mooney,et al.  Modeling the Exchanges of Energy, Water, and Carbon Between Continents and the Atmosphere , 1997, Science.

[47]  C. Justice,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part II: The Generation of Global Fields of Terrestrial Biophysical Parameters from Satellite Data , 1996 .

[48]  Yogesh C. Sud,et al.  Intercomparison of hydrologic processes in AMIP GCMs , 1996 .

[49]  J. Noilhan,et al.  Key results and implications from phase 1(c) of the Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parametrization Schemes , 1999 .

[50]  Y. Xue,et al.  Use of midlatitude soil moisture and meteorological observations to validate soil moisture simulations with biosphere and bucket models , 1995 .

[51]  Thomas L. Delworth,et al.  Climate variability and land-surface processes , 1993 .

[52]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  The influence of potential evaporation on the variabilities of simulated soil wetness and climate , 1988 .

[53]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  The Interplay between Transpiration and Runoff Formulations in Land Surface Schemes Used with Atmospheric Models , 1997 .

[54]  S. Manabe,et al.  Summer dryness due to an increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration , 1981 .

[55]  G. K. Walker,et al.  Global Fields of Soil Moisture and Land Surface Evapotranspiration Derived from Observed Precipitation and Surface Air Temperature. , 1993 .

[56]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  On the spatial organization of soil moisture fields , 1995 .

[57]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Modeling vadose zone liquid water fluxes: Infiltration, runoff, drainage, interflow , 1996 .

[58]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Averaging of Meteorological Fields , 1997 .

[59]  M. Budyko.  The heat balance of the earth's surface , 1958 .

[60]  D. Randall,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation , 1996 .

[61]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1993 .

[62]  W. Gates.  AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. , 1992 .