Encouraging Patients to Ask Questions: Development and Pilot Testing of a Question Prompt List for Patients Undergoing a Biopsy for Suspected Prostate Cancer

This study assessed the acceptability and feasibility of a question prompt list (QPL) to facilitate informed treatment decision-making in men with suspected localised prostate cancer, which involves values-based choices between options with similar efficacy but different side effects. The QPL was developed through iterative consultation with consumers, clinicians and researchers. Acceptability was assessed using study-specific questions regarding QPL satisfaction and usefulness and qualitative interviews. Feasibility was determined via the proportion of men given the QPL according to medical records and the completion of standardised measures of decisional outcomes. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and univariate statistics. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. Fifty-two men consented; 34 provided data for analysis. The QPL recipients reported moderate–high content satisfaction (70.6%) and perceived usefulness in guiding appointments when receiving biopsy results (64.7%). Two main qualitative themes also indicated the QPL acceptability: (1) the freedom to ask—acceptable timing, flexible usage and usefulness of the QPL, and (2) satisfaction with the QPL content. However, only 18.4% of eligible men received the QPL, indicating limited feasibility. The QPL is safe and acceptable, but further research is needed regarding how to facilitate the uptake of the question prompt list in clinical practice.

[1]  A. Girgis,et al.  Low conflict and high satisfaction: Decisional outcomes after attending a combined clinic to choose between robotic prostatectomy and radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2021, Urologic oncology.

[2]  L. Janani,et al.  Impact of using question prompt list on shared decision making in the cancer patient: A systematic review , 2021 .

[3]  J. Huebner,et al.  Effect of question prompt lists for cancer patients on communication and mental health outcomes-A systematic review. , 2021, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  M. Schuler,et al.  Question prompts to empower cancer patients: results of a randomized controlled trial , 2019, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[5]  A. Girgis,et al.  Robot or radiation? A qualitative study of the decision support needs of men with localised prostate cancer choosing between robotic prostatectomy and radiotherapy treatment. , 2019, Patient education and counseling.

[6]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  Shared Decision Making in Prostate Cancer Care—Encouraging Every Patient to be Actively Involved in Decision Making or Ensuring the Patient Preferred Level of Involvement? , 2018, The Journal of urology.

[7]  Universities Australia.  Australian code for the responsible conduct of research , 2018 .

[8]  A. Gavin,et al.  The psychological impact of prostate biopsy: Prevalence and predictors of procedure‐related distress , 2018, Psycho-oncology.

[9]  Ronald C. Chen,et al.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[10]  C. Porter,et al.  Longitudinal regret after treatment for low‐ and intermediate‐risk prostate cancer , 2017, Cancer.

[11]  K. Brandes,et al.  Implementing consultation audio-recordings and question prompt lists into routine cancer care: How can we address healthcare providers' barriers? , 2017, Patient education and counseling.

[12]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Clinically localized prostate cancer in 2017: A review of comparative effectiveness. , 2017, Urologic oncology.

[13]  David Gillatt,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  C. Nelson,et al.  What Is a “Good” Treatment Decision? Decisional Control, Knowledge, Treatment Decision Making, and Quality of Life in Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer , 2016, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  M. Taljaard,et al.  Implementation of a patient decision aid for men with localized prostate cancer: evaluation of patient outcomes and practice variation , 2015, Implementation Science.

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment choice: Systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2015, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[17]  P. Butow,et al.  The characteristics and effectiveness of Question Prompt List interventions in oncology: a systematic review of the literature , 2015, Psycho-oncology.

[18]  C. Heckler,et al.  The association between partner support and psychological distress among prostate cancer survivors in a nationwide study , 2015, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[19]  C. Chuang,et al.  Changes in decisional conflict and decisional regret in patients with localised prostate cancer. , 2014, Journal of clinical nursing.

[20]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  Using a question prompt list as a communication aid in advanced cancer care. , 2014, Journal of oncology practice.

[21]  J. Rattray,et al.  Exploring the relationship between coping, social support and health-related quality of life for prostate cancer survivors: a review of the literature. , 2013, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[22]  Steven B. Zeliadt,et al.  A preliminary exploration of the feasibility of offering men information about potential prostate cancer treatment options before they know their biopsy results , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[23]  Phyllis N Butow,et al.  Implementing patient question-prompt lists into routine cancer care. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[24]  P. Butow,et al.  Can a “prompt list” empower cancer patients to ask relevant questions? , 2008, Cancer.

[25]  M. Hertzog.  Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. , 2008, Research in nursing & health.

[26]  J WiltTimothy,et al.  Clinically localized prostate cancer , 2007 .

[27]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[28]  F. Oort,et al.  Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[29]  P. Butow,et al.  Asking questions can help: development of a question prompt list for cancer patients seeing a surgeon , 2003, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[30]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[31]  null Not Available.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki , 2000 .

[32]  J A Sloan,et al.  The Control Preferences Scale. , 1997, The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres.

[33]  A. O'Connor.  Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[34]  T. Ichida.  World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki , 1991, Gastroenterologia Japonica.

[35]  E. Blanchard,et al.  The impact of oncologists' behaviors on patient satisfaction with morning rounds , 1986, Cancer.

[36]  Robert Harris,et al.  THE NATIONAL HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL , 1951, The Medical journal of Australia.

[37]  K. Jaiswal,et al.  The Waiting Game: How Long Are Breast Cancer Patients Waiting for Definitive Diagnosis? , 2020 .

[38]  S. Rogers,et al.  A review of question prompt lists used in the oncology setting with comparison to the Patient Concerns Inventory , 2018, European journal of cancer care.

[39]  S. Berndt,et al.  Letters to the Editor/Errata Re: Complications after Prostate Biopsy: Data from SEER-Medicare , 2012 .

[40]  E. Somers.  International Agency for Research on Cancer. , 1985, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.