Interactive Product Design Selection With an Implicit Value Function

We present a new method to aid a decision maker (DM) in selecting the most preferred from a set of design alternatives. The method is deterministic and assumes that the DM's preferences reflect an implicit value function that is quasi-concave. The method is interactive, with the DM stating preferences in the form of attribute tradeoffs at a series of trial designs, each a specific design under consideration. The method is iterative and uses the gradient of the value function obtained from the preferences of the DM to eliminate lower value designs at each trial design. We present an approach for finding a new trial design at each iteration. We provide an example, the design selection for a cordless electric drill, to demonstrate the method. We provide results showing that (within the limit of our experimentation) our method needs only a few iterations to find the most preferred design alternative. Finally we extend our deterministic selection method to account for uncertainty in the attributes when the probability distributions governing the uncertainty are known.

[1]  Jonathan Barzilai On the decomposition of value functions , 1998, Oper. Res. Lett..

[2]  H. Li,et al.  Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[3]  Wei Chen,et al.  An Approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling , 2003 .

[4]  R. Sundaram A First Course in Optimization Theory , 1996 .

[5]  Mokhtar S. Bazaraa,et al.  Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms , 1993 .

[6]  Olvi L. Mangasarian,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1969 .

[7]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Optimization of design utility , 1991 .

[9]  Behnam Malakooti,et al.  A decision support system and a heuristic interactive approach for solving discrete multiple criteria problems , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  F. Lootsma Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis via Ratio and Difference Judgement , 1999 .

[11]  Joseph J. Talavage,et al.  A Tradeoff Cut Approach to Multiple Objective Optimization , 1980, Oper. Res..

[12]  Hui Li,et al.  An Approach for Product Line Design Selection under Uncertainty and Competition , 2002 .

[13]  Sundar Krishnamurty,et al.  Learning-Based Preference Modeling in Engineering Design Decision-Making , 2001 .

[14]  S. Zionts,et al.  Preference structure representation using convex cones in multicriteria integer programming , 1989 .

[15]  Behnam Malakooti Theories and an exact interactive paired-comparison approach for discrete multiple-criteria problems , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[16]  S. Zionts,et al.  Solving the Discrete Multiple Criteria Problem using Convex Cones , 1984 .

[17]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Real and Misconceived Limitations to Decision Based Design With Utility Analysis , 2001 .

[18]  Arthur M. Geoffrion,et al.  An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department , 1972 .

[19]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  An Intelligent Real Time Design Methodology for Component Selection: An Approach to Managing Uncertainty , 1994 .

[20]  Stanley Zionts,et al.  An improved method for solving multiple criteria problems involving discrete alternatives , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[21]  David L. Olson,et al.  Decision Aids for Selection Problems , 1995 .

[22]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .

[23]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design , 1998 .