Exploring the Relationship Between Aesthetic Design as an Element of New Service Development and Performance

The purpose of this research is to investigate the conditions under which the use of aesthetic design as an element of new service development is likely to improve performance—more specifically, to empirically examine how aesthetic design can contribute to competitive advantage, resistance to imitation, and profitability, and how these contributions are moderated by the process of commoditization. Based on analysis of three rounds of longitudinal data collected one year apart in a population of new technology-based firms, the findings are that aesthetic design as an element of new service development can contribute positively to competitive advantage, resistance to imitation, and profitability, but that the effectiveness of using aesthetic design to achieve these outcomes differs depending on the level of commoditization. Positive relationships are found between the use of aesthetic design and competitive advantage and profitability, respectively, when the level of commoditization is high. Furthermore, the positive relationship between aesthetic design and resistance to service imitation is stronger when the relative importance of aesthetic design in a firms' sector is low, that is, conditions under which aesthetic design is not already expected. This research suggests that practitioners should consider using aesthetic design to counteract commoditization when the markets in which they compete are characterized by ready access to services that meet customers' needs and expectations for features, performance, and reliability, and expectations for aesthetic design have not already become established. Furthermore, they should be aware that the use of aesthetic design may turn into a baseline customer requirement, implying that while attention to aesthetic design is necessary to compete it may cease to constitute a potential source of competitive advantage.

[1]  Ron Adner,et al.  A demand‐based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage , 2006 .

[2]  Robert W. Veryzer.  The Roles of Marketing and Industrial Design in Discontinuous New Product Development , 2005 .

[3]  Christine T. Ennew,et al.  Measuring business-to-business professional service quality and its consequences , 2005 .

[4]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[5]  F. Ian Stuart,et al.  Toward an integrative approach to designing service experiences Lessons learned from the theatre , 2004 .

[6]  Ina Drejer.  Identifying innovation in surveys of services: A Schumpeterian perspective , 2004 .

[7]  Jens Frøslev Christensen.  Asset profiles for technological innovation , 1995 .

[8]  Marina Candi,et al.  DESIGN AS AN ELEMENT OF INNOVATION: EVALUATING DESIGN EMPHASIS IN TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2006 .

[9]  Chris Storey,et al.  The Augmented Service Offering: A Conceptualization and Study of Its Impact on New Service Success , 1998 .

[10]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design , 2004 .

[11]  Marina Candi,et al.  The role of design in the development of technology-based services , 2007 .

[12]  Ulrike de Brentani.  Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success , 2001 .

[13]  I. Miles,et al.  Innovation, Measurement and Services: the new problematique , 2000 .

[14]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[15]  Rögnvaldur J. Saemundsson.  Entrepreneurship, technology, and the growth process. A study of young, medium-sized technology-based firms , 2003 .

[16]  S. Bell,et al.  Customer relationship dynamics: Service quality and customer loyalty in the context of varying levels of customer expertise and switching costs , 2005 .

[17]  Gregory N. Stock,et al.  Building Dynamic Capabilities in New Product Development through Intertemporal Integration , 2003 .

[18]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective , 2007 .

[19]  C. Lovelock.  Classifying Services to Gain Strategic Marketing Insights , 1983 .

[20]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Value Creation Versus Value Capture: Towards a Coherent Definition of Value in Strategy , 2000 .

[21]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  Towards a theory of the technology-based firm 1 Paper originally presented at the workshop on `Techn , 1998 .

[22]  Vivien Walsh,et al.  Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm , 1996 .

[23]  M. Berry,et al.  Combining technology and corporate strategy in small high tech firms , 1998 .

[24]  Ulrike de Brentani.  Success Factors in Developing New Business Services , 1991 .

[25]  Madeleine E. Pullman,et al.  Ability of Experience Design Elements to Elicit Emotions and Loyalty Behaviors , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[26]  Mel Yamamoto,et al.  The impact of product aesthetics on the evaluation of industrial products , 1994 .

[27]  R. Cooper,et al.  What distinguishes the top performing new products in financial services , 1994 .

[28]  C. Slappendel.  Industrial design utilization in New Zealand firms , 1996 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Christopher J. Easingwood,et al.  New product development for service companies , 1986 .

[31]  Artemis March,et al.  Usability: The new dimension of product design , 1994 .

[32]  Johan Redström,et al.  Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design , 2006 .

[33]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  The economics of technical change , 1994 .

[34]  Clayton M. Christensen.  Patterns in the evolution of product competition , 1997 .

[35]  Robert T. Keller,et al.  A RESOURCE-BASED STUDY OF NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PREDICTING FIVE-YEAR LATER COMMERCIAL SUCCESS AND SPEED TO MARKET , 2004 .

[36]  Lynn L. Bollinger,et al.  A review of literature and hypotheses on new technology-based firms , 1983 .

[37]  A. Khalifa.  Customer value: a review of recent literature and an integrative configuration , 2004 .

[38]  Marjorie B. Platt,et al.  The Impact of Industrial Design Effectiveness on Corporate Financial Performance , 2005 .

[39]  G. Gemser,et al.  How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance , 2001 .

[40]  Henry Mintzberg.  Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[41]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[42]  J. H. Gilmore,et al.  Welcome to the experience economy. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[43]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  New Technology-Based Firms In Sweden - A Study Of Their Direct Impact On Industrial Renewal , 1999 .

[45]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Value-based Business Strategy , 2005 .

[46]  Paul Gardiner,et al.  Design and competition in engineering , 1984 .

[47]  Paul D. Reynolds,et al.  New venture strategies: theory development with an empirical base , 1994 .

[48]  Faïz Gallouj,et al.  Innovation in services , 1997 .

[49]  Lisa Z. Song,et al.  Pioneering Advantage in New Service Development: A Multi-Country Study of Managerial Perceptions , 2000 .

[50]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Mapping between design activities and external representations for engineering student designers , 2006 .

[51]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[52]  P. Patterson,et al.  The impact of communication effectiveness and service quality on relationship commitment in consumer, professional services , 1999 .

[53]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  Characterizing the Role of Design in New Product Development: An Empirically Derived Taxonomy* , 2005 .

[54]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/mde.1126 Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle , 2022 .