Modelling and simulations of a central pattern generator controlled, antagonistically actuated limb joint

Wearable assistive devices (WAD) assist rehabilitation and recuperation. However, WADs' development is impeded by traditional actuators and current control paradigms' lack of compliance and adaptability, in contrast to the mammalian central nervous system. A limb's joint's compliance is a function of muscles' level of activation and passive viscoelastic properties. Increased equal and unequal co-activation of a limb joint's muscles leads to an increasingly stable joint. Unequal limb joint muscle activation leads to an angular displacement. Muscles' activation is controlled by alpha motor neurons, which are innervated by the spinal-cord's autonomous neural networks, i.e. central pattern generators. Given a continuous excitatory supraspinal input, a two-level, mutually inhibiting, CPG network can control an antagonistically actuated limb joint's muscles' level of activation, thus the joint's compliance, and joint oscillation frequency.

[1]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  VSA-II: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  D. McCrea,et al.  Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from deletions during fictive locomotion , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[4]  R. Ham,et al.  Compliant actuator designs , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[5]  Ian E. Brown,et al.  Virtual muscle: a computational approach to understanding the effects of muscle properties on motor control , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  T. Brown The intrinsic factors in the act of progression in the mammal , 1911 .

[7]  Ian E. Brown,et al.  Mechanics of feline soleus: II design and validation of a mathematical model , 1996, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[8]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[9]  Ilya A Rybak,et al.  Modeling the mammalian locomotor CPG: insights from mistakes and perturbations. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[10]  John J. Craig Zhu,et al.  Introduction to robotics mechanics and control , 1991 .

[11]  E. J. Cheng,et al.  Measured and modeled properties of mammalian skeletal muscle. II. The effectsof stimulus frequency on force-length and force-velocity relationships , 1999, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[12]  Nicola Vitiello,et al.  A sensorless torque control for Antagonistic Driven Compliant Joints , 2010 .

[13]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  D. McCrea,et al.  Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from the effects of afferent stimulation , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  D. McCrea,et al.  Organization of mammalian locomotor rhythm and pattern generation , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.