Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation

PurposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) as assessed by the intraoperative use of knee navigation software during the surgical procedure.MethodsFifteen patients with primary gonarthrosis were selected for unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The first three patients were excluded from this study, as they were considered to be a warm up to set-up the procedure. All patients were operated on with a cemented posterior-stabilised prosthesis cruciate ligament-sacrificing by the same surgeon using the patient matched cutting jigs. The size of the implant, level of resection, and alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes were evaluated. An unsatisfactory result was considered an error ≥2° in both planes for each component as a possible error of 4° could result in aggravation.ResultsOn the coronal plane the mean deviation of the tibial guide from the ideal alignment was 1.2 ± 1.5 (range 0–5°) and in the sagittal plane was 3.8 ± 2.4 (range 0–7.5°). On the coronal plane the mean deviation of the femoral guide from the ideal alignment was 1.2 ± 0.6 and in the sagittal was 3.7 ± 2.ConclusionOn the basis of this preliminary experience the PSI system based only on data acquisition with A-P radiograms and RMN cannot be defined as accurate. In cases of the use of the custom made cutting jigs it is recommended to perform an accurate control of the alignment before making the cuts, for any step of the procedure.Level of evidenceII.

[1]  T. Cheng,et al.  Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. , 2012, Knee (Oxford).

[2]  William J Hozack,et al.  Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  R. Magnussen,et al.  Residual Varus Alignment does not Compromise Results of TKAs in Patients with Preoperative Varus , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  S. Banks,et al.  The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  D. Fisher,et al.  Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  Tao Cheng,et al.  Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  M A Freeman,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  J. Moreland Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[10]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  J. J. Jacobs,et al.  Malrotation Causing Patellofemoral Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  B. F. Morrey,et al.  Can Computer Assistance Improve the Clinical and Functional Scores in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2012 .

[13]  Ning Liu,et al.  The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  A. Leardini,et al.  Navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty in knees with osteoarthritis due to extra-articular deformity , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[15]  Michael A. Mont,et al.  Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[16]  B B Seedhom,et al.  Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Patient-specific Templating , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  H. Chong,et al.  Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[18]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  K. Bozic,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: in opposition. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.