Improved Sub-Pixel Mapping Method Coupling Spatial Dependence With Directivity and Connectivity

Accurate land cover mapping by using coarse resolution imageries has been an attractive research topic. Sub-pixel mapping has been proven efficient for allocating sub-pixels within a mixed pixel. The most likely distribution can be determined on the condition of maximized spatial dependence. However, linear land cover like roads and rivers cannot be predicted efficiently because of weaker spatial dependence between and within mixed pixels. To obtain more accurate classification at the sub-pixel scale, an improved sub-pixel mapping method by combining spatial dependence with directivity and connectivity of linear land cover was proposed. Central line of linear land cover was extracted from fraction images to provide site-specific information. Discriminated allocation targets were accordingly designed: both connectivity and directivity were considered as important auxiliary information for allocating linear land cover, whereas only maximized spatial dependence is required for other classes. Then, simulated annealing arithmetic (SAA) was applied to optimize sub-pixel allocation. The method was evaluated visually and quantitatively with the accuracy indices. Compared with the model that considers only spatial dependence, SPM HIIPD method, attraction model and hard classifier (MLC), the improved method can increase classification accuracy at the sub-pixel scale with both simulated imageries and partial SPOT remotely sensed imagery.

[1]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  Remote Sensing Image Subpixel Mapping Based on Adaptive Differential Evolution , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[2]  Liguo Wang,et al.  Subpixel Mapping Using Markov Random Field With Multiple Spectral Constraints From Subpixel Shifted Remote Sensing Images , 2013, IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett..

[3]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Super-resolution target identification from remotely sensed images using a Hopfield neural network , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Fei Xiao,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping of remotely sensed imagery with hybrid intra- and inter-pixel dependence , 2013 .

[5]  L. P. C. Verbeke,et al.  Using genetic algorithms in sub-pixel mapping , 2003 .

[6]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[7]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Contextual Subpixel Mapping of Hyperspectral Images Making Use of a High Resolution Color Image , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Lieven Verbeke,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping and sub-pixel sharpening using neural network predicted wavelet coefficients , 2004 .

[9]  Kathryn A. Dowsland,et al.  Simulated Annealing , 1989, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[10]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Mapping sub-pixel vector boundaries from remotely sensed images , 1996 .

[11]  S. Saura,et al.  Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  Richard G. Lathrop,et al.  Sub-pixel estimation of urban land cover components with linear mixture model analysis and Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery , 2005 .

[13]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Spectral Unmixing for the Classification of Hyperspectral Images at a Finer Spatial Resolution , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[14]  M. Q. Nguyen,et al.  Superresolution mapping using a Hopfield neural network with lidar data , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[15]  Dongmei Chen,et al.  The impact of image and class structure upon sub-pixel mapping accuracy using the pixel-swapping algorithm , 2011, Ann. GIS.

[16]  Liguo Wang Subpixel Mapping Using Markov Random Field With Multiple Spectral Constraints From Subpixel Shifted Remote Sensing Images , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[17]  P. Atkinson Sub-pixel Target Mapping from Soft-classified, Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2005 .

[18]  Fei Xiao,et al.  Subpixel Land Cover Mapping by Integrating Spectral and Spatial Information of Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2012, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[19]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Localized soft classification for super‐resolution mapping of the shoreline , 2006 .

[20]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping based on artificial immune systems for remote sensing imagery , 2013, Pattern Recognit..

[21]  Peter Rossmanith,et al.  Simulated Annealing , 2008, Taschenbuch der Algorithmen.

[22]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  A linearised pixel-swapping method for mapping rural linear land cover features from fine spatial resolution remotely sensed imagery , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[23]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Combining Pixel Swapping and Contouring Methods to Enhance Super-Resolution Mapping , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Danfeng Liu,et al.  Particle swarm optimization-based sub-pixel mapping for remote-sensing imagery , 2012 .

[25]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Subpixel Mapping Based on a Multiagent System for Remote-Sensing Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  D. Roberts,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping of urban land cover using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis: Manaus, Brazil , 2007 .

[27]  A. Cracknell Review article Synergy in remote sensing-what's in a pixel? , 1998 .

[28]  Lieven Verbeke,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping: a comparison of techniques. , 2006 .

[29]  Koen C. Mertens,et al.  A sub‐pixel mapping algorithm based on sub‐pixel/pixel spatial attraction models , 2006 .