Inference of causality in epidemics on temporal contact networks

Investigating into the past history of an epidemic outbreak is a paramount problem in epidemiology. Based on observations about the state of individuals, on the knowledge of the network of contacts and on a mathematical model for the epidemic process, the problem consists in describing some features of the posterior distribution of unobserved past events, such as the source, potential transmissions, and undetected positive cases. Several methods have been proposed for the study of these inference problems on discrete-time, synchronous epidemic models on networks, including naive Bayes, centrality measures, accelerated Monte-Carlo approaches and Belief Propagation. However, most traced real networks consist of short-time contacts on continuous time. A possibility that has been adopted is to discretize time line into identical intervals, a method that becomes more and more precise as the length of the intervals vanishes. Unfortunately, the computational time of the inference methods increase with the number of intervals, turning a sufficiently precise inference procedure often impractical. We show here an extension of the Belief Propagation method that is able to deal with a model of continuous-time events, without resorting to time discretization. We also investigate the effect of time discretization on the quality of the inference.

[1]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  What's in a crowd? Analysis of face-to-face behavioral networks , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Alessandro Ingrosso,et al.  The patient-zero problem with noisy observations , 2014, 1408.0907.

[3]  Petter Holme,et al.  Simulated Epidemics in an Empirical Spatiotemporal Network of 50,185 Sexual Contacts , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Maria A. Kazandjieva,et al.  A high-resolution human contact network for infectious disease transmission , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Lenka Zdeborová,et al.  Inferring the origin of an epidemy with dynamic message-passing algorithm , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  W. Freeman,et al.  Bethe free energy, Kikuchi approximations, and belief propagation algorithms , 2001 .

[7]  Devavrat Shah,et al.  Detecting sources of computer viruses in networks: theory and experiment , 2010, SIGMETRICS '10.

[8]  Riccardo Zecchina,et al.  Bayesian inference of epidemics on networks via Belief Propagation , 2013, Physical review letters.

[9]  Nino Antulov-Fantulin,et al.  Statistical Inference Framework for Source Detection of Contagion Processes on Arbitrary Network Structures , 2013, 2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops.

[10]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Locating the Source of Diffusion in Large-Scale Networks , 2012, Physical review letters.

[11]  Devavrat Shah,et al.  Rumors in a Network: Who's the Culprit? , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Norman Margolus,et al.  Physics and Computation , 1987 .

[13]  Luis E C Rocha,et al.  Information dynamics shape the sexual networks of Internet-mediated prostitution , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.