Biologically effective dose values for prostate brachytherapy: effects on PSA failure and posttreatment biopsy results.

PURPOSE To analyze the effect of biologically effective dose (BED) values on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure and posttreatment biopsy. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1990 to 2003, 1,377 patients had prostate brachytherapy alone (I-125 or Pd-103) (571), hormonal and brachytherapy (371), and trimodality therapy (hormonal, implant, and external beam) (435). Dose was defined as the D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the gland from the dose-volume histogram). RESULTS Freedom from PSA failure (FFPF) at 10 years was 87%. The 10-year FFPF for BED<100, >100-120, >120-140, >140-160, <160-180, >180-200, and >200 were 46%, 68%, 81%, 85.5%, 90%, 90%, and 92%, respectively (p<0.0001). BED and Gleason score had the greatest effect, with p values of p<0.0001 in multivariate analysis. Posttreatment positive biopsy rate was 7% (31/446). The positive biopsy rates for BED<or=100, >100-120, >120-140, >140-160, >160-180, >180-200, and >200 were 24% (8/33), 15% (3/20), 6% (2/33), 6% (3/52), 7% (6/82), 1% (1/72), and 3% (4/131), respectively (p<0.0001). BED was the most significant predictor of biopsy outcome in multivariate analysis (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS Biologically effective dose equations provide a method of comparing different isotopes and combined therapies in the brachytherapy management of prostate cancer. The effects of BED on FFPF and posttreatment biopsy demonstrate a strong dose-response relationship.

[1]  R. Stock,et al.  Prostate brachytherapy: treatment strategies. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[2]  G E Hanks,et al.  Patterns of care studies: dose-response observations for local control of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  P. Unger,et al.  Intermediate term biochemical-free progression and local control following 125iodine brachytherapy for prostate cancer. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[4]  P. Unger,et al.  The effect of disease and treatment‐related factors on biopsy results after prostate brachytherapy , 2000, Cancer.

[5]  A. Dicker,et al.  Salvage of suboptimal prostate seed implantation: Reimplantation of underdosed region of prostate base. , 2005, Brachytherapy.

[6]  G H Fletcher,et al.  Changes in early and late radiation responses with altered dose fractionation: implications for dose-survival relationships. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  W. Cavanagh,et al.  125I versus 103Pd for low-risk prostate cancer: preliminary PSA outcomes from a prospective randomized multicenter trial. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  R. Stock,et al.  A modified technique allowing interactive ultrasound-guided three-dimensional transperineal prostate implantation. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  George Starkschall,et al.  Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Rick Chappell,et al.  Is α/β for prostate tumors really low? , 2001 .

[11]  C B Begg,et al.  The effect of local control on metastatic dissemination in carcinoma of the prostate: long-term results in patients treated with 125I implantation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  P. Unger,et al.  Seminal vesicle biopsy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: implications for patient selection in the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Jian Z. Wang,et al.  Impact of tumor repopulation on radiotherapy planning. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  R. Stock,et al.  Role of hormonal therapy in the management of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent radioactive seed implantation. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Nelson N. Stone,et al.  Postimplant dosimetry for (125)I prostate implants: definitions and factors affecting outcome. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  James D. Cox,et al.  Consensus statement: Guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy , 1997 .

[17]  R. Stock,et al.  A dose-response study for I-125 prostate implants. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  R. Stock,et al.  Combined modality treatment in the management of high-risk prostate cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  R. Stock,et al.  Biochemical outcomes after prostate brachytherapy with 5-year minimal follow-up: importance of patient selection and implant quality. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  D. Lea,et al.  The mechanism of the induction by radiation of chromosome aberrations inTradescantia , 1942, Journal of Genetics.

[21]  J. Fowler,et al.  A comment on proliferation rates in human prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  David J Brenner,et al.  What hypofractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer? , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS 13.0 Guide to Data Analysis , 2000 .

[24]  L. Potters,et al.  A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  David J Brenner,et al.  Hypofractionation for prostate cancer radiotherapy--what are the issues? , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  R Oyen,et al.  Cell kinetic measurements in prostate cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  J. Fowler The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. , 1989, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  D. Brenner,et al.  Direct evidence that prostate tumors show high sensitivity to fractionation (low α/β ratio), similar to late-responding normal tissue , 2002 .

[29]  D J Brenner,et al.  Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  G. Barendsen,et al.  Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  H D Thames,et al.  Time-dose factors in radiotherapy: a review of the human data. , 1990, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[32]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Biological effective dose for comparison and combination of external beam and low-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy prostate cancer treatment plans. , 2004, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[33]  R G Dale,et al.  The application of the linear-quadratic dose-effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[34]  X. Allen Li,et al.  HOW LOW IS THE / RATIO FOR PROSTATE CANCER? , 2003 .