The impact of the means of context evocation on consumers' emotion associations towards eating occasions

The joint investigation of the product, the consumer, and the consumption context is necessary for furthering the understanding of eating occasions (snacks and main meals), including their construction and enjoyment. The study of people’s experience of eating occasions is less advanced than the understanding of acceptability, preference, and choice of individual food/beverage items and/or their combination in meals. The current research contributes to narrowing this gap by focusing on emotions as a dimension of eating experiences and enjoyment. Under evoked consumption contexts (breakfast, lunch, afternoon snack, dinner), the emotion associations for several products (potato crisps, chocolate brownie, and kiwifruit) were obtained from consumers (n = 399) using a questionnaire method. Emotion associations were explored in relation to: (1) the way in which the food stimulus was evaluated by participants (tasting food vs. seeing a food image); (2) the serving presentation of the food stimulus (image of food shown in isolation vs. image of food served on a plate with cutlery); and (3) the means in which the consumption context was evoked (written vs. written and pictorial). Consumers’ product emotion associations when tasting a food stimulus vs. seeing an image of the same food were highly similar. There was some evidence that more specific means of presenting the food stimuli (with tableware vs. without tableware) and consumption contexts (written and pictorially vs. written only) influenced perceived appropriateness of the product in the focal consumption context. This resulted, for example, in a higher frequency of use of negative emotion terms in the less appropriate consumption contexts. Overall, through the use of evoked consumption contexts this research has contributed new understanding of product-specific emotional associations during eating occasions from a methodological approach. In addition to the aforementioned results a more general finding was the apparent reliance by participants on past product experiences when completing the emotion questionnaire.

[1]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Consistency of Liking and Appropriateness Ratings and Their Relation to Consumption in a Product Test of Ice Cream , 1995, Appetite.

[2]  S. Drummond,et al.  A critique of the effects of snacking on body weight status. , 1996, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[3]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Uncovering cultural differences in choice behaviour between Samoan and New Zealand consumers: a case study with apples. , 2000 .

[4]  H. Schutz.  Appropriateness as a measure of the cognitive-contextual aspects of food acceptance , 1994 .

[5]  A. Cardello,et al.  Measuring emotional responses to foods and food names using questionnaires , 2012 .

[6]  D. Phillips.  How Does It Make Me Feel? , 2000 .

[7]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Emotion responses under evoked consumption contexts: A focus on the consumers’ frequency of product consumption and the stability of responses , 2014 .

[8]  Collin R. Payne,et al.  “Is this a meal or snack?” Situational cues that drive perceptions , 2010, Appetite.

[9]  Birk Diedenhofen,et al.  Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[10]  P. Desmet,et al.  Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience , 2008, Appetite.

[11]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Application of a written scenario to evoke a consumption context in a laboratory setting: Effects on hedonic ratings , 2010 .

[12]  Nancy Spears,et al.  Revealing obstacles to the consumer imagination , 2014 .

[13]  J. Wardle,et al.  Young children's food preferences: a comparison of three modalities of food stimuli , 2000, Appetite.

[14]  P. Sheehan,et al.  A shortened form of Betts' questionnaire upon mental imagery. , 1967, Journal of clinical psychology.

[15]  G. Hough,et al.  Sensory analysis of broccoli over time: Consumer defined critical attributes and evaluation of digital photographs in comparison to real product appearance , 2013 .

[16]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[17]  Deborah J. MacInnis,et al.  Constructs and Measures of Individual Differences in Imagery Processing: a Review , 1987 .

[18]  Charles Spence,et al.  Assessing the impact of the tableware and other contextual variables on multisensory flavour perception , 2012, Flavour.

[19]  The role of imagery in models of cognition. , 1977 .

[20]  Armand V. Cardello,et al.  Food appropriateness measures as an adjunct to consumer preference/acceptability evaluation , 1996 .

[21]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions , 1987 .

[22]  Charles Spence,et al.  The Influence of the Color of the Cup on Consumers' Perception of a Hot Beverage , 2012 .

[23]  Punam Anand,et al.  The Effect of Vivid Attributes on the Evaluation of Alternatives: The Role of Differential Attention and Cognitive Elaboration , 1989 .

[24]  Lorraine Brown,et al.  The relationship between emotions and food consumption (macronutrient) in a foodservice college setting – a preliminary study , 2013, International journal of food sciences and nutrition.

[25]  Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein,et al.  From salad to bowl: The role of sensory analysis in product experience research , 2010 .

[26]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of evoked consumption contexts and appropriateness on emotion responses , 2014 .

[27]  Marsha L. Richins.  Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience , 1997 .

[28]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Innovation in sensory practice and education: an interview with Howard Schutz , 2010 .

[29]  Use and appropriateness in cheese choice, and an evaluation of attributes influencing appropriateness , 1994 .

[30]  H. Meiselman.  The future in sensory/consumer research: ……….....evolving to a better science , 2013 .

[31]  D. Ariely.  Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions , 2008 .

[32]  Devina Wadhera,et al.  Categorization of foods as “snack” and “meal” by college students , 2012, Appetite.

[33]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices , 1998 .

[34]  Karen Lusk.  Studies to improve consumer hedonic measures : a comparison of hedonic measurement techniques and the development of a method to evoke consumption contexts in a laboratory test setting , 2011 .

[35]  R. Gordon.  An investigation into some of the factors that favour the formation of stereotyped images. , 1949, The British journal of psychology. General section.

[36]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Methodological issues in conjoint analysis: a case study , 2001 .

[37]  John M. Rose,et al.  Stated choice experimentation, contextual influences and food choice: A case study , 2008 .

[38]  Edward H. Rosenstock,et al.  Reliability of Two Measures of Imagery , 1976 .

[39]  Armand V. Cardello,et al.  Emotion questionnaires: A consumer-centric perspective , 2013 .

[40]  M. Hui,et al.  The Ecological Validity of Photographic Slides and Videotapes in Simulating the Service Setting , 1992 .

[41]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Effects of evoked consumption contexts on hedonic ratings: A case study with two fruit beverages , 2012 .

[42]  A. Cardello,et al.  Predictors of food acceptance, consumption and satisfaction in specific eating situations , 2000 .

[43]  Herbert L. Meiselman,et al.  Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods , 2010 .

[44]  P. Bone,et al.  The Generation and Consequences of Communication-evoked Imagery , 1992 .