A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. II. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability

A simplified spiraled model of the human cochlea is developed from a cross sectional photograph. The potential distribution within this model cochlea is calculated with the finite element technique for an active scala tympani implant. The method in the companion article [Rattay et al., 2001] allows for simulation of the excitation process of selected elements of the cochlear nerve. The bony boundary has an insulating influence along every nerve fiber which shifts the stimulation condition from that of a homogeneous extracellular medium towards constant field stimulation: for a target neuron which is stimulated by a ring electrode positioned just below the peripheral end of the fiber the extracellular voltage profile is rather linear. About half of the cochlear neurons of a completely innervated cochlea are excited with monopolar stimulation at three-fold threshold intensity, whereas bipolar and especially quadrupolar stimulation focuses the excited region even for stronger stimuli. In contrast to single fiber experiments with cats, the long peripheral processes in human cochlear neurons cause first excitation in the periphery and, consequently, neurons with lost dendrite need higher stimuli.

[1]  Design of the Cochlear Prosthesis: Effects of the Flow of Current in the Implanted Ear , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[2]  Joseph D. Bronzino,et al.  The Biomedical Engineering Handbook , 1995 .

[3]  Frank Rattay,et al.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes , 2001, Hearing Research.

[4]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents , 1998, Hearing Research.

[5]  Oded Ghitza.  Auditory models and human performance in tasks related to speech coding and speech recognition , 1994 .

[6]  R. Schoonhoven,et al.  Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1995, Hearing Research.

[7]  C. Jolly,et al.  Quadrupolar stimulation for cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric Permittivity and Electrical Conductivity of Fluid Saturated Bone , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  J. Frijns,et al.  Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1996, Hearing Research.

[10]  Frank Rattay,et al.  Speech Sound Representation in the Auditory Nerve: Computer Simulation Studies on Inner Ear Mechanisms , 1997 .

[11]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Current Distribution Measurements Within the Human Cochlea , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  F. Rattay.  Analysis of Models for External Stimulation of Axons , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[14]  D Strelioff.  A computer simulation of the generation and distribution of cochlear potentials. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  G. Békésy.  The Coarse Pattern of the Electrical Resistance in the Cochlea of the Guinea Pig (Electroanatomy of the Cochlea) , 1951 .

[16]  Frank Rattay,et al.  Electrical Nerve Stimulation , 1990 .

[17]  W M Jenkins,et al.  BIOPHYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Frank Rattay,et al.  Electrical Nerve Stimulation: "Theory, Experiments And Applications" , 2001 .

[19]  F. Spelman,et al.  Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.