Optical imaging of breast cancer oxyhemoglobin flare correlates with neoadjuvant chemotherapy response one day after starting treatment

Approximately 8–20% of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy fail to achieve a measurable response and endure toxic side effects without benefit. Most clinical and imaging measures of response are obtained several weeks after the start of therapy. Here, we report that functional hemodynamic and metabolic information acquired using a noninvasive optical imaging method on the first day after neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment can discriminate nonresponding from responding patients. Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging was used to measure absolute concentrations of oxyhemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin, water, and lipid in tumor and normal breast tissue of 24 tumors in 23 patients with untreated primary breast cancer. Measurements were made before chemotherapy, on day 1 after the first infusion, and frequently during the first week of therapy. Various multidrug, multicycle regimens were used to treat patients. Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging measurements were compared with final postsurgical pathologic response. A statistically significant increase, or flare, in oxyhemoglobin was observed in partial responding (n = 11) and pathologic complete responding tumors (n = 8) on day 1, whereas nonresponders (n = 5) showed no flare and a subsequent decrease in oxyhemoglobin on day 1. Oxyhemoglobin flare on day 1 was adequate to discriminate nonresponding tumors from responding tumors. Very early measures of chemotherapy response are clinically convenient and offer the potential to alter treatment strategies, resulting in improved patient outcomes.

[1]  B. Tromberg Imaging Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Response with Light: Commentary on Soliman et al., p. 2605 , 2011 .

[2]  E. Cronin,et al.  Early-stage invasive breast cancers: potential role of optical tomography with US localization in assisting diagnosis. , 2010, Radiology.

[3]  David Hsiang,et al.  Frequent optical imaging during breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy reveals dynamic tumor physiology in an individual patient. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[4]  Bruce J. Tromberg,et al.  Imaging Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Response with Light , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Functional Imaging Using Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Women with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Predictors of tumor progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  S. Fanti,et al.  Early 18F‐2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐d‐glucose positron emission tomography may identify a subset of patients with estrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer who will not respond optimally to preoperative chemotherapy , 2010, Cancer.

[8]  B. Pogue,et al.  Evaluation of breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tomographic diffuse optical spectroscopy: case studies of tumor region-of-interest changes. , 2009, Radiology.

[9]  David Hsiang,et al.  Effect of contact force on breast tissue optical property measurements using a broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy handheld probe. , 2009, Applied optics.

[10]  Elisabeth Kjellén,et al.  Early changes in 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose metabolism in squamous-cell carcinoma during chemotherapy in vivo and in vitro. , 2009, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[11]  Hon J. Yu,et al.  Predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by using MR imaging and quantitative 1H MR spectroscopy. , 2009, Radiology.

[12]  D. Green,et al.  Immunogenic and tolerogenic cell death , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[13]  Min-Ying Su,et al.  Impact of MRI-Evaluated Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response on Change of Surgical Recommendation in Breast Cancer , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[14]  Russell G. Jones,et al.  Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth. , 2009, Genes & development.

[15]  Winfried Brenner,et al.  Monitoring primary systemic therapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer by using sequential positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  David Hsiang,et al.  Diffuse optical spectroscopy measurements of healing in breast tissue after core biopsy: case study. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[17]  J. Talbot,et al.  Early evaluation of the effects of chemotherapy with longitudinal FDG small-animal PET in human testicular cancer xenografts: early flare response does not reflect refractory disease , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Noninvasive monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy using optical tomography with ultrasound localization. , 2008, Neoplasia.

[19]  J. Twisk,et al.  Preoperative [18F] FDG-PET after chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: prognostic value as compared with histopathology. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[20]  J. Marks,et al.  Serum biomarker profiles and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[21]  L. Zitvogel,et al.  Immunogenicity of anthracyclines: moving towards more personalized medicine. , 2008, Trends in molecular medicine.

[22]  E. Winer,et al.  Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  D. Berry,et al.  Research issues affecting preoperative systemic therapy for operable breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  S. Paik,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  S. Ancoli-Israel,et al.  Predictors of inflammation in response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy for breast cancer , 2008, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.

[26]  Bruce J. Tromberg,et al.  Quantitative Absorption and Scattering Spectra in Thick Tissues Using Broadband Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy , 2008 .

[27]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: new perspectives 2006. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[28]  Christos Hatzis,et al.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  I. Bradbury,et al.  Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. , 2007, Health technology assessment.

[30]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Diffuse optical monitoring of blood flow and oxygenation in human breast cancer during early stages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[31]  P. Fumoleau,et al.  [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[32]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  E. Croteau,et al.  A Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography Study of the Effect of Chemotherapy and Hormonal Therapy on the Uptake of 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose in Murine Models of Breast Cancer , 2007, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[34]  E. White,et al.  Metabolic catastrophe as a means to cancer cell death , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[35]  L. Zitvogel,et al.  Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell death , 2007, Nature Medicine.

[36]  Ludovic Ferrer,et al.  Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  B. Tromberg,et al.  In vivo absorption, scattering, and physiologic properties of 58 malignant breast tumors determined by broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy. , 2006, Journal of biomedical optics.

[38]  A. Tardivon,et al.  Monitoring therapeutic efficacy in breast carcinomas , 2006, European Radiology.

[39]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  The nuclear transcription factor kappaB/bcl-2 pathway correlates with pathologic complete response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in human breast cancer. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[41]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Imaging in breast cancer: Diffuse optics in breast cancer: detecting tumors in pre-menopausal women and monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[42]  Soren D. Konecky,et al.  Diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a case study with comparison to MRI. , 2005, Medical physics.

[43]  Dianne Georgian-Smith,et al.  Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[44]  D. L. Wilhelm Mechanisms responsible for increased vascular permeability in acute inflammation , 1973, Agents and Actions.

[45]  A. Cavaliere,et al.  Biopathological profile of multiple synchronous homolateral and bilateral breast cancers. , 2004, Pathology, research and practice.

[46]  E. Bruera,et al.  Changes in plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines in response to paclitaxel chemotherapy. , 2004, Cytokine.

[47]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Spatial variations in optical and physiological properties of healthy breast tissue. , 2002, Journal of biomedical optics.

[48]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using quantitative diffuse optical spectroscopy: a case study. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[49]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Early changes in apoptosis and proliferation following primary chemotherapy for breast cancer , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[50]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Chemotherapy‐Induced Apoptosis and Bcl‐2 Levels Correlate with Breast Cancer Response to Chemotherapy , 2003, Cancer journal.

[51]  J. Giammarco,et al.  Bulk optical properties of healthy female breast tissue. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[52]  J. Bryant,et al.  Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy , 2002 .

[53]  N. Tsavaris,et al.  Immune changes in patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy with taxanes , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[54]  J. Bryant,et al.  Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. , 2002, Cancer.

[55]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Sources of absorption and scattering contrast for near-infrared optical mammography. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[56]  B. Pogue,et al.  Quantitative hemoglobin tomography with diffuse near-infrared spectroscopy: pilot results in the breast. , 2001, Radiology.

[57]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Broad bandwidth frequency domain instrument for quantitative tissue optical spectroscopy , 2000 .

[58]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[59]  P F Sharp,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[60]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[61]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Broadband absorption spectroscopy in turbid media by combined frequency-domain and steady-state methods. , 2000, Applied optics.

[62]  J. Klijn,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women , 1999, Disease Markers.

[63]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Monitoring the response of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using [technetium 99m]‐sestamibi scintimammography , 1999, Cancer.

[64]  I. Kushner,et al.  Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[65]  B. Qaqish,et al.  Deletion diagnostics for generalised estimating equations , 1996 .

[66]  K. Calman,et al.  Immunological Aspects of Cancer Chemotherapy , 1980 .

[67]  G. Majno,et al.  Acute inflammation. A review. , 1977, The American journal of pathology.