A simple protocol for paraffin‐embedded myelin sheath staining with osmium tetroxide for light microscope observation

Experimental investigation of peripheral nerve fiber regeneration is attracting more and more attention among both basic and clinical researchers. Assessment of myelinated nerve fiber morphology is a pillar of peripheral nerve regeneration research. The gold standard for light microscopic imaging of myelinated nerve fibers is toluidine blue staining of resin‐embedded semithin sections. However, many researchers are unaware that the dark staining of myelin sheaths typically produced by this procedure is due to osmium tetroxide postfixation and not due to toluidine blue. In this article, we describe a simple pre‐embedding protocol for staining myelin sheaths in paraffin‐embedded nerve specimens using osmium tetroxide. The method involves immersing the specimen in 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 h after paraformaldeyde fixation, followed by routine dehydration and paraffin embedding. Sections can then be observed directly under the microscope or counterstained using routine histological methods. Particularly good results were obtained with Masson's trichrome counterstain, which permits the imaging of connective structures in nerves that are not detectable in toluidine blue‐stained resin sections. Finally, we describe a simple protocol for osmium etching of sections, which makes further immunohistochemical analysis possible on the same specimens. Taken together, our results suggest that the protocol described in this article is a valid alternative to the conventional resin embedding‐based protocol: it is much cheaper, can be adopted by any histological laboratory, and allows immunohistochemical analysis to be conducted. Microsc. Res. Tech., 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  A. Höke Mechanisms of Disease: what factors limit the success of peripheral nerve regeneration in humans? , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Neurology.

[2]  Stefano Geuna,et al.  Nerve repair by means of vein filled with muscle grafts I. Clinical results , 2000, Microsurgery.

[3]  M. Dykstra A Manual of Applied Techniques for Biological Electron Microscopy , 1993 .

[4]  P. Tos,et al.  Schwann cell behavior after nerve repair by means of tissue‐engineered muscle‐vein combined guides , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  C. Vleggeert-Lankamp,et al.  The role of evaluation methods in the assessment of peripheral nerve regeneration through synthetic conduits: a systematic review. Laboratory investigation. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  P. Tos,et al.  Morphological analysis of peripheral nerve regenerated by means of vein grafts filled with fresh skeletal muscle , 2000, Anatomy and Embryology.

[7]  B Battiston,et al.  Nerve repair by means of vein filled with muscle grafts. II. Morphological analysis of regeneration , 2000, Microsurgery.

[8]  G. Lundborg Enhancing posttraumatic nerve regeneration , 2002, Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS.

[9]  C T Chalfoun,et al.  Tissue engineered nerve constructs:where do we stand? , 2006, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[10]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Comparison of fresh and predegenerated muscle‐vein‐combined guides for the repair of rat median nerve , 2007, Microsurgery.

[11]  F. Fitch Histological Techniques for Electron Microscopy , 1961 .

[12]  Stefano Geuna,et al.  End-to-side (terminolateral) nerve regeneration: A challenge for neuroscientists coming from an intriguing nerve repair concept , 2006, Brain Research Reviews.