RF MEMS electrical contact resistance calculation using mechanical contact simulations and analytical models

The testing and development of contact material or topology can be addressed with a dedicated experimental set up for monitoring test structures. However, it is difficult to perform the tests under realistic conditions. Moreover several works have already been published about the different theories describing rough mechanical contact. But they often ignore interaction between asperities, bulk deformation or elastoplastic deformations. In order to tackle these issues advanced simulation tools are needed. These tools for finite element analysis allow us to model assembly structures quickly and accurately with a minimal amount of effort. We have developed an original reverse engineering method for generating rough surfaces on ANSYS platform, by using the actual shape of the contact surface.We used this method to predict the real contact area between rough surfaces as a function of the applied force using the augmented Lagrangian method. The number of asperities in contact, their sizes and their distribution allow us to discriminate the more appropriate electric contact model in diffusive or ballistic electron transport. MEM test structures with gold-to-gold electric contacts are fabricated and tested with an experimental set up in NovaMEMS/CNES lab and will allow to validate the new methodology. The contact resistance is monitored during all experiments, to correlate the mechanical and electrical behavior of the structure. The measurements are in progress. We can already expect to some discrepancies due to the difficulty to measure accurately contact material properties and to the potential contamination around the metal contact area. Yet this application is a major concern in RF MEMS ohmic switches and shows an original approach to extract a guideline in choosing a design, materials and process flow to minimize the contact resistance.

[1]  D. Bogy,et al.  An Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces , 1987 .

[2]  Jan M. van Ruitenbeek,et al.  Quantum properties of atomic-sized conductors , 2002, cond-mat/0208239.

[3]  Luis Ferreira,et al.  Rough Contacts Between Actual Engineering Surfaces- Part II: Contact Mechanics , 2008 .

[4]  F. P. Bowden,et al.  Friction: An Introduction to Tribology , 1973 .

[5]  L. Boyer,et al.  Contact resistance calculations: generalizations of Greenwood's formula including interface films , 2001 .

[6]  B. Lincoln Elastic Deformation and the Laws of Friction , 1953, Nature.

[7]  Prasanta Sahoo,et al.  Finite element contact analysis of fractal surfaces , 2007 .

[8]  John I. McCool,et al.  Comparison of models for the contact of rough surfaces , 1986 .

[9]  Frédéric Houzé,et al.  Constriction resistance of a multispot contact: an improved analytical expression , 1990 .

[10]  L. Kogut,et al.  Elastic-Plastic Contact Analysis of a Sphere and a Rigid Flat , 2002 .

[11]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Fractal Model of Elastic-Plastic Contact Between Rough Surfaces , 1991 .

[12]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[13]  S. Timsit,et al.  Electrical contact resistance: properties of stationary interfaces , 1998, Electrical Contacts - 1998. Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (Cat. No.98CB36238).

[14]  H. K. Kim,et al.  Size-dependent electrical constriction resistance for contacts of arbitrary size: from Sharvin to Holm limits , 1999 .

[15]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contact of nominally flat surfaces , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[16]  Luis Ferreira,et al.  Rough contacts between actual engineering surfaces: Part I. Simple models for roughness description , 2008 .

[17]  I. Green,et al.  A Finite Element Study of Elasto-Plastic Hemispherical Contact Against a Rigid Flat , 2005 .