Cropping Intensity Effects on Physical Properties of a No‐till Silt Loam

No-till cropping systems in the semiarid West have the potential to improve soil physical properties by increasing cropping intensity and crop diversity. An investigation at Akron, CO, compared soil conditions in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-summer fallow (WF) plots with soil conditions in wheat-corn (Zea mays L.)-fallow (WCF), wheat-corn-sunflower (Helianthus annus L.)-fallow (WCSF), wheat-corn-millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) (WCM), and a perennial grass/legume mix. The study began in 1990. Bulk density, pore size distribution, and saturated hydraulic conductivity were measured 7, 11, and 15 yr after inception. Bulk density in the grass plots decreased from 1.39 to 1.25 Mg m -3 in 15 yr. Bulk density in the annually cropped plots decreased from 1.38 to 1.30 Mg m -3 during the same time period. The pore size distribution became more uniform among the cropped treatments 15 yr after the start of the experiment. Saturated hydraulic conductivity increased in the grass plots from 27 mm h -1 to 98 mm h -1 in 15 yr. Saturated hydraulic conductivity in the annually cropped plots increased from about 14 to about 35 mm h -1 during the same period. The results from this study show that improving soil physical properties by cropping system alone may take many years. Perennial vegetation may be more effective than annually cropped systems at improving soil physical conditions because of less surface compaction from planting operations and the apparent ability of perennial root systems to create a more stable, continuous pore network.

[1]  S. Merrill,et al.  Cropping system influences on soil physical properties in the Great Plains , 2006, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[2]  Alan J. Schlegel,et al.  Management Effects on Soil Physical Properties in Long‐Term Tillage Studies in Kansas , 2006 .

[3]  B. McConkey,et al.  Cropping system influences on soil chemical properties and soil quality in the Great Plains , 2006, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[4]  R. Rees,et al.  The role of crop rotations in determining soil structure and crop growth conditions , 2005 .

[5]  Gerrit H. de Rooij,et al.  Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods , 2004 .

[6]  D. Nielsen,et al.  Quantifying effects of soil conditions on plant growth and crop production , 2003 .

[7]  J. Crawford,et al.  New methods and models for characterising structural heterogeneity of soil , 2001 .

[8]  D. Nielsen,et al.  Soil Organic Matter Changes in Intensively Cropped Dryland Systems , 1999 .

[9]  D. Nielsen,et al.  Alternative Crop Rotations for the Central Great Plains , 1999 .

[10]  A. Halvorson,et al.  Crop Rotation and Tillage Effects on Phosphorus Distribution in the Central Great Plains , 1997 .

[11]  J. Kirkegaard,et al.  Subsoil amelioration by plant roots : the process and the evidence , 1995 .

[12]  J. Reeder,et al.  CHANGES IN SOIL PROPERTIES IN A CENTRAL PLAINS RANGELAND SOIL AFTER 3, 20, AND 60 YEARS OF CULTIVATION1 , 1990 .

[13]  R. R. Allmaras,et al.  Physical and Chemical Properties of a Haploxeroll after Fifty Years of Residue Management , 1986 .

[14]  Charles B. Elkins,et al.  Plant roots as tillage tools , 1985 .

[15]  H. Kuipers,et al.  Tillage machinery systems as related to cropping systems , 1985 .

[16]  A. L. Black,et al.  Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Bulk Density Comparisons in Two Cropland Tillage Systems after 25 Years and in Virgin Grassland 1 , 1981 .