Probing the hierarchy of evidence to identify the best strategy for placing class II dental composite restorations using current materials.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E. Ercan,et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of one nano-hybrid and one high-viscosity bulk-fill composite restorative systems in class II cavities: 12 months results , 2017, Nigerian journal of clinical practice.
[2] A. Briso,et al. Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial of Class II Restorations Using Low-shrinkage Flowable Resin Composite. , 2019, Operative dentistry.
[3] Sheung-Hoon Park,et al. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites. , 2017, Operative dentistry.
[4] C. Davidson,et al. The Competition between the Composite-Dentin Bond Strength and the Polymerization Contraction Stress , 1984, Journal of dental research.
[5] G. M. Marchi,et al. Evaluation of Bond Strength, Nanoleakage, and Marginal Adaptation of Bulk-fill Composites Submitted to Thermomechanical Aging. , 2019, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[6] H. Schaller,et al. A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of a one-step, self-etch adhesive with and without an intermediary layer of a flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation. , 2012, Quintessence international.
[7] P. Schmidlin,et al. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[8] D. Atabek,et al. Two-year clinical performance of sonic-resin placement system in posterior restorations. , 2017, Quintessence international.
[9] M. Forghani,et al. Evaluating Resin-Dentin Bond by Microtensile Bond Strength Test: Effects of Various Resin Composites and Placement Techniques , 2015, The open dentistry journal.
[10] J. Y. Thompson,et al. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. , 1998, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[11] E. Swift,et al. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. , 1999, Journal of esthetic dentistry.
[12] Neil B. Cramer,et al. Recent Advances and Developments in Composite Dental Restorative Materials , 2011, Journal of dental research.
[13] N. Opdam,et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[14] A. Jokstad. Secondary caries and microleakage. , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[15] U. Pallesen,et al. Bulk‐filled posterior resin restorations based on stress‐decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6‐year evaluation , 2017, European journal of oral sciences.
[16] B. Willershausen,et al. Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner , 2003, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[17] R. Hickel,et al. Clinical evaluation of the bulk fill composite QuiXfil in molar class I and II cavities: 10-year results of a RCT. , 2018, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[18] H. Balkaya,et al. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results , 2019, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.
[19] T. Attin,et al. Margin Integrity of Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth , 2020, Materials.
[20] J. Hodges,et al. The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results. , 2004, Quintessence international.
[21] I. Krejci,et al. In Vitro Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Direct Class II Composite Restorations Made of Different "Low-Shrinkage" Systems. , 2017, Operative dentistry.
[22] S. Kamat,et al. Effect of pre-heating composite resin on gap formation at three different temperatures , 2011, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.
[23] C. Turssi,et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of high viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations. , 2020, American Journal of Dentistry.
[24] Jack L Ferracane,et al. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[25] J. Ferracane,et al. Effect of heat on the flow of commercial composites. , 2009, American journal of dentistry.
[26] P. Hörstedt,et al. In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner , 2005, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[27] M. Giannini,et al. External Marginal Gap Evaluation of Different Resin-Filling Techniques for Class II Restorations-A Micro-CT and SEM Analysis. , 2020, Operative dentistry.
[28] U. Blunck,et al. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation. , 2010, Operative dentistry.
[29] A. Garg,et al. Evaluation of cervical marginal and internal adaptation using newer bulk fill composites: An in vitro study , 2015, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.
[30] C. Lynch,et al. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations. , 2018, Journal of dentistry.
[31] C. Davidson,et al. Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.
[32] J. Ferracane. Models of Caries Formation around Dental Composite Restorations , 2017, Journal of dental research.
[33] G. Sandborgh-Englund,et al. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults – A systematic review. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.
[34] S. Majidinia,et al. Retrospective evaluation of the clinical performance of direct composite restorations using the snow-plow technique: Up to 4 years follow-up , 2019, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.
[35] S. Antonson,et al. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations. , 2017, Operative dentistry.
[36] Chih-Han Chang,et al. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations. , 2004, Operative dentistry.
[37] M. Cross,et al. Does an Incremental Filling Technique Reduce Polymerization Shrinkage Stresses? , 1996, Journal of dental research.
[38] A. Loguércio,et al. Evaluation of Bond Strength, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Strength of Bulk- vs Incrementally-filled Restorations. , 2016, Journal of Adhesive Dentistry.
[39] A. Georgescu,et al. Evaluation of Pre-heating Effects on Marginal Adaptation of Resin-based Materials , 2018, Materiale plastice.
[40] I Krejci,et al. Marginal adaptation of direct class II composite restorations with different cavity liners. , 2013, Operative dentistry.
[41] Rasha Al-Sheikh. Effects of Different Application Techniques on Nanohybrid Composite Restorations Clinical Success , 2019, The Open Dentistry Journal.
[42] T. Hilton. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. , 2002, American journal of dentistry.
[43] S. Heintze,et al. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope. , 2015, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[44] J. Ferracane,et al. At the Interface of Materials and Microbiology: A Call for the Development of Standardized Approaches to Assay Biomaterial-Biofilm Interactions , 2019, Journal of dental research.
[45] D. Kaisarly,et al. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations. , 2016, Operative dentistry.
[46] Reinhard Hickel,et al. Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite Quixfil in class I and II cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[47] R. Frankenberger,et al. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. , 2011, Journal of dentistry.
[48] S. Heintze. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. , 2013, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[49] C. Dörter,et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner. , 2006, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[50] A. Lussi,et al. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing. , 2017, Operative dentistry.
[51] M. Manso,et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[52] J. Ferracane,et al. Polymerization stress--is it clinically meaningful? , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[53] D. Bardwell,et al. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. , 2002, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[54] G. Tosun,et al. Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children , 2020, Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice.
[55] Y. Bayraktar,et al. One‐year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk‐fill composites , 2017, Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry.
[56] A. Reis,et al. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations. , 2019, Journal of dentistry.
[57] T. Attin,et al. Comparison between different flow application techniques: SDR vs flowable composite. , 2013, The journal of adhesive dentistry.
[58] E. Bronkhorst,et al. Longevity of Posterior Composite Restorations , 2014, Journal of dental research.
[59] J. Ferracane. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[60] C. Pfeifer,et al. Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin -a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[61] U. Pallesen,et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. , 2015, Operative dentistry.
[62] Katarzyna Lewusz-Butkiewicz,et al. Marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill materials used for class II restorations -A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. , 2020, Dental materials journal.
[63] Hm El-Damanhoury,et al. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. , 2014, Operative dentistry.
[64] A. Moritz,et al. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[65] U. İnan,et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[66] U. Pallesen,et al. Clinical performance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite: a 7-year evaluation. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[67] A. Khan,et al. Clinical Effectiveness of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Resin Composite Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Polymers.
[68] I. Krejci,et al. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.
[69] Agata Szczesio-Wlodarczyk,et al. Ageing of Dental Composites Based on Methacrylate Resins—A Critical Review of the Causes and Method of Assessment , 2020, Polymers.
[70] I. Mjör. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. , 1998, Quintessence international.
[71] S. Abboud,et al. Clinical evaluation of class II composite: Resin restorations placed by two different bulk-fill techniques , 2016 .
[72] M. Hadis,et al. Shining a light on high volume photocurable materials. , 2018, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[73] W. Teughels,et al. Secondary caries: prevalence, characteristics, and approach , 2019, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[74] E. Pellizzer,et al. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[75] H. Yadav,et al. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.