Generic sentences: Representativeness or Causality?

Many generic sentences express stable inductive generalizations. Stable inductive generalizations are typically true for a causal reason. In this paper we investigate to what extent this is also the case for the generalizations expressed by generic sentences. More in particular, we discuss the possibility that many generic sentences of the form ‘ks have feature e’ are true because (members of) kind k have the causal power to ‘produce’ feature e. We will argue that such an analysis is quite close to a probabilistic based analysis of generic sentences according to which ‘relatively many’ ks have feature e, and that, in fact, this latter type of analysis can be ‘grounded’ in terms of causal powers. We will argue, moreover, that the causal power analysis is sometimes preferred to a correlation-based analysis, because it takes the causal structure that gives rise to the probabilistic data into account. Unfortunately, there are problems for the causal power analysis too, and we will discuss them as well.

[1]  John M. Lawler,et al.  Studies in English generics , 1973 .

[2]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[3]  P. Spirtes,et al.  Causation, prediction, and search , 1993 .

[4]  N. O'shaughnessy Selling Hitler: Propaganda and the Nazi Brand , 2016 .

[5]  P. Cheng From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. , 1997 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Causal Schemata in Judgments under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[7]  E. Pols Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity , 1976 .

[8]  Sydney Shoemaker,et al.  Causality and Properties , 1980 .

[9]  J. Pearl Interpretation and Identification of Causal Mediation , 2013, Psychological methods.

[10]  B. Carpenter,et al.  Think Generic!: The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences , 1999 .

[11]  F. Keil Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[12]  David Danks,et al.  Unifying the Mind: Cognitive Representations as Graphical Models , 2014 .

[13]  M. C. Sheps,et al.  Shall we count the living of the dead. , 1958, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Brian Ellis,et al.  Causal Powers and Laws of Nature , 1999 .

[15]  Sally Haslanger,et al.  Ideology, Generics, and Common Ground , 2011 .

[16]  Y. Greenberg Manifestations of Genericity , 2003 .

[17]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  Generics: Cognition and Acquisition , 2008 .

[18]  D. Braddon-Mitchell NATURE'S CAPACITIES AND THEIR MEASUREMENT , 1991 .

[19]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[20]  G. Strawson,et al.  The Secret Connexion: Causation, Realism, and David Hume , 2014 .

[21]  Donald Nute,et al.  Counterfactuals , 1975, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[22]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  5. Essence and Natural Kinds: When Science Meets Preschooler Intuition 1 , 2013 .

[23]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  Explaining Four Psychological Asymmetries in Causal Reasoning : Implications of Causal Assumptions for Coherence , 2007 .

[24]  Marc Lange Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties , 2010 .

[25]  S. Sloman Causal Models: How People Think about the World and Its Alternatives , 2005 .

[26]  I. Good A CAUSAL CALCULUS (I)* , 1961, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[27]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems , 1988 .