Influence of the Vehicle on the Tissue Reaction and Biomineralization of Fast Endodontic Cement

Objective: To investigate the tissue response and the biomineralization ability of CER prepared with epoxy resin or water compared to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Material and Methods: Polyethylene tubes containing materials or empty tubes for control were inserted into the subcutaneous tissues of 30 rats. After 7, 15, 30, 60, and 90 days, the rats were killed and the tubes were removed for analysis using hematoxylin-eosin staining, von Kossa staining, and under polarized light. Inflammation was graded through a score system; the thickness of the fibrous capsule was classified as thin or thick; the biomineralization ability was recorded as present or absent. The results were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05). Results: Histologic analysis performed after 7 and 15 days for CER prepared with epoxy resin or water and for MTA showed moderate inflammation and a thick fibrous capsule (p>0.05). After 30, 60, and 90 days, mild inflammation, and a thin fibrous capsule were observed in all groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: All materials had structures positive for von Kossa and birefringent to polarized light. CER epoxy resin showed biocompatibility and biomineralization similar to CER water and MTA.

[1]  E. Ervolino,et al.  Cytotoxicity, inflammation, biomineralization, and immunoexpression of IL-1β and TNF-α promoted by a new bioceramic cement , 2020, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[2]  E. Ervolino,et al.  Biocompatibility and biomineralization ability of Bio-C Pulpecto. A histological and immunohistochemical study. , 2019, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[3]  E. Ervolino,et al.  Biocompatibility and immunohistochemical evaluation of a new calcium silicate‐based cement, Bio‐C Pulpo , 2019, International endodontic journal.

[4]  L. Â. Cintra,et al.  Cytotoxicity, Biocompatibility, and Biomineralization of the New High‐plasticity MTA Material , 2017, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  K. Almas,et al.  In Vitro Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Root Canal Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis: A Systematic Review. , 2016, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  L. Â. Cintra,et al.  Biocompatibility and biomineralization assessment of bioceramic-, epoxy-, and calcium hydroxide-based sealers. , 2016, Brazilian oral research.

[7]  E. Ervolino,et al.  Hypertension Undermines Mineralization-inducing Capacity of and Tissue Response to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Endodontic Cement. , 2016, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  A. D. Santos,et al.  Cytotoxic effects of new MTA-based cement formulations on fibroblast-like MDPL-20 cells. , 2016, Brazilian oral research.

[9]  G. Mori,et al.  Biocompatibility evaluation of biodentine in subcutaneous tissue of rats. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  B. Willershausen,et al.  Influence of a bioceramic root end material and mineral trioxide aggregates on fibroblasts and osteoblasts. , 2013, Archives of oral biology.

[11]  B. Gomes,et al.  Evaluation of cytotoxicity and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer MTA Fillapex. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  P. Cerri,et al.  Biocompatibility of an experimental MTA sealer implanted in the rat subcutaneous: quantitative and immunohistochemical evaluation. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[13]  J. C. Silos Moraes,et al.  Evaluation of the tissue reaction to fast endodontic cement (CER) and Angelus MTA. , 2009, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  F. Grecca,et al.  Analysis of tissue reactions to methacrylate resin-based, epoxy resin-based, and zinc oxide-eugenol endodontic sealers. , 2009, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  J. Camilleri The physical properties of accelerated Portland cement for endodontic use. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[16]  G. P. Stewart,et al.  Chemical modification of proroot mta to improve handling characteristics and decrease setting time. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  D. Salvadori,et al.  Biocompatibility in vitro tests of mineral trioxide aggregate and regular and white Portland cements. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  E. Araújo,et al.  Physico-chemical properties of MTA and a novel experimental cement. , 2005, International endodontic journal.

[19]  H. Issever,et al.  Reactions of connective tissue to mineral trioxide aggregate and amalgam. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  Á. Della Bona,et al.  Comparative in vivo analysis of the sealing ability of three endodontic sealers in post-prepared root canals. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[22]  Qiang Zhu,et al.  Cell and tissue reactions to mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[23]  P. Novaes,et al.  Glycol methacrylate: an alternative method for embedding subcutaneous implants. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[24]  L. A. Silva,et al.  Evaluation of apical sealing of three endodontic sealers. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[25]  R. Holland,et al.  Reaction of rat connective tissue to implanted dentin tubes filled with mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.

[26]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.