Seismic behaviour of self‐centring braced frame buildings with reusable hysteretic damping brace

This paper presents the seismic behaviour of a concentrically braced frame system with self-centring capability, in which a special type of bracing element termed reusable hysteretic damping brace (RHDB) is used. The RHDB is a passive energy dissipation device with its core energy-dissipating component made of superelastic Nitinol wires. Compared with conventional bracing in steel structures, RHDB has a few prominent performance characteristics: damage free under frequent and design basis earthquakes in earthquake prone areas; minimal residual drifts due to the self-centring capability of RHDB frame; and ability to survive several strong earthquakes without the need for repair or replacement. This paper also includes a brief discussion of the RHDB's mechanical configuration and analytical model for RHDB. The seismic performance study of RHDB frame was carried out through a non-linear time history analysis of 3-storey and 6-storey RHDB frame buildings subjected to two suites of 20 earthquake ground motions. The analysis results were compared with buckling-restrained brace (BRB) frames. This study shows that RHDB frame has a potential to outperform BRB frames by eliminating the residual drift problem. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Y. Kurama,et al.  Lateral Load Behavior and Seismic Design of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls , 1999 .

[2]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  CYCLIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY WIRES AND BARS , 2004 .

[3]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys , 2000 .

[4]  Richard Sause,et al.  Posttensioned Seismic-Resistant Connections for Steel Frames , 2001 .

[5]  John C. Wilson,et al.  Shape Memory Alloys for Seismic Response Modification: A State-of-the-Art Review , 2005 .

[6]  M. Dolce,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of shape memory alloys for seismic applications 2. Austenite NiTi wires subjected to tension , 2001 .

[7]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Experimental and analytical studies of shape-memory alloy dampers for structural control , 1995, Smart Structures.

[8]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Seismic response of self‐centring hysteretic SDOF systems , 2002 .

[9]  DONATELLO GARDONE,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF R/C FRAMES RETROFITTED WITH DISSIPATING AND RE-CENTRING BRACES , 2004 .

[10]  E. J. Graesser,et al.  Shape‐Memory Alloys as New Materials for Aseismic Isolation , 1991 .

[11]  Christoph Czaderski,et al.  Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures—Overview, limits and new ideas , 2005 .

[12]  Krzysztof Wilde,et al.  Base isolation system with shape memory alloy device for elevated highway bridges , 2000 .

[13]  STEFANO PAMPANIN,et al.  PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC RESPONSE OF FRAME STRUCTURES INCLUDING RESIDUAL DEFORMATIONS. PART II: MULTI-DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[14]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Research and Application of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames , 2004 .

[15]  T. T. Soong,et al.  STRUCTURAL CONTROL: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 1997 .

[16]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces , 2003 .

[17]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Posttensioned Energy Dissipating Connections for Moment-Resisting Steel Frames , 2002 .

[18]  C. Valente,et al.  Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems , 2005 .