METEOR: a step-by-step procedure to explore effects of indicator aggregation in multi criteria decision aiding – application to water management in Berlin, Germany

METEOR (METhod of Evaluation by ORder) is introduced as a new evaluation approach, based on partial order theory. METEOR combines transparent decision support and convenient tools for data analysis with the ability to include stakeholders' preferences in the decision process. The basic idea is a systematic step-by-step aggregation of indicators, including their weighting. We applied METEOR to evaluate the eco-hydrological effects of nine water management strategies upon the complex surface water system of Berlin and Potsdam, Germany. Altogether 14 river sections are defined, each of which is evaluated by a set of four hydro-chemical indicators. Aggregation of indicators was performed on two levels: spatially with respect to the river sections, and thematically to the four indicators themselves. The METEOR result is in good agreement with that obtained by the PROMETHEE approach. However, advantages of METEOR are (1) identification of sensitive steps of indicator aggregation, and (2) extraction of explanatory background information about advantages and disadvantages of scenarios. Both topics enhance the transparency of the evaluation process and thus support public acceptance of the decision.

[1]  Marcello G. Reggiani,et al.  On ranking chemicals for environmental hazard , 1986 .

[2]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Aspects of decision support in water management--example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany) I--spatially differentiated evaluation. , 2004, Water research.

[3]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Application of multicriteria decision making methods to air quality in the microenvironments of residential houses in Brisbane, Australia. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  B. Roy.  THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[5]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Applying the Concept of Partially Ordered Sets on the Ranking of Near-Shore Sediments by a Battery of Tests , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[6]  R Lahdelma,et al.  Using Multicriteria Methods in Environmental Planning and Management , 2000, Environmental management.

[7]  Klaus Möller,et al.  Nachhaltige wasserwirtschaft : entwicklung eines bewertungs- und prüfsystems , 2002 .

[8]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[9]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[10]  Komaragiri Srinivasa Raju,et al.  Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Komaragiri Srinivasa Raju,et al.  Multicriterion decision making in performance evaluation of an irrigation system , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems , 1998 .

[13]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Estimation of Averaged Ranks by a Local Partial Order Model , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[14]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Application of the Concept of Partial Order on Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Chemicals , 1999 .

[15]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Order Theoretical Tools for the Evaluation of Complex Regional Pollution Patterns , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[16]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Analysing Water Resources Alternatives and Handling Criteria by Multi Criterion Decision Techniques , 1996 .

[17]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[18]  Christoph A. Schneeweiss.  Systemanalytische und entscheidungstheoretische Grundlagen , 1991 .

[19]  Ulrich Maniak.  Wasserwirtschaft : Einführung in die Bewertung wasserwirtschaftlicher Vorhaben , 2001 .