Roles of the upper and lower bodies in direction discrimination of point-light walkers.

We can easily recognize human movements from very limited visual information (biological motion perception). The present study investigated how upper and lower body areas contribute to direction discrimination of a point-light (PL) walker. Observers judged the direction that the PL walker was facing. The walker performed either normal walking or hakobi, a walking style used in traditional Japanese performing arts, in which the amount of the local motion of extremities is much smaller than that in normal walking. Either the upper, lower, or full body of the PL walker was presented. Discrimination performance was found to be better for the lower body than for the upper body. We also found that discrimination performance for the lower body was affected by walking style and/or the amount of local motion signals. Additional eye movement analyses indicated that the observers initially inspected the region corresponding to the upper body, and then the gaze shifted toward the lower body. This held true even when the upper body was absent. We conjectured that the upper body subserved to localize the PL walker and the lower body to discriminate walking direction. We concluded that the upper and lower bodies play different roles in direction discrimination of a PL walker.

[1]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion , 2002, Perception.

[2]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Contribution of configural information in a direction discrimination task: Evidence using a novel masking paradigm , 2009, Vision Research.

[3]  Paul Griffith,et al.  A Guide to the Japanese Stage: From Traditional to Cutting Edge , 2005 .

[4]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Characterizing global and local mechanisms in biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[5]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[6]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  Armin Bruderlin,et al.  Perceiving affect from arm movement , 2001, Cognition.

[8]  Steven M. Thurman,et al.  Perceptual and computational analysis of critical features for biological motion. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[9]  A. Young,et al.  Emotion Perception from Dynamic and Static Body Expressions in Point-Light and Full-Light Displays , 2004, Perception.

[10]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Subconfigurations of the human form in the perception of biological motion displays. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Wendy Baccus,et al.  Early integration of form and motion in the neural response to biological motion , 2009, Neuroreport.

[12]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[13]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor , 2005, Vision Research.

[15]  Zili Liu,et al.  Computing dynamic classification images from correlation maps. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[16]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J. Lange,et al.  Visual perception of biological motion by form: a template-matching analysis. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[19]  Nikolaus F Troje,et al.  Allocation of attention to biological motion: local motion dominates global shape. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[20]  Nikolaus F Troje,et al.  Gaze patterns during perception of direction and gender from biological motion. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[21]  S. Lea,et al.  Perception of Emotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays Represented in Dance , 1996, Perception.

[22]  M. Thirkettle,et al.  Contributions of form, motion and task to biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[23]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[24]  N. Troje Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[25]  N. Troje,et al.  The facing bias in biological motion perception: structure, kinematics, and body parts , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[26]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Perceiving depth in point-light actions , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[29]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[30]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human and animal motion in point-light displays , 2009, Social neuroscience.

[31]  M. Lappe,et al.  Perception of biological motion from limited-lifetime stimuli , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Emily D Grossman,et al.  Temporal "Bubbles" reveal key features for point-light biological motion perception. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[33]  A. Watson Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.