Verification of Spark-Resistance Formulae for Micro-Gap ESD

Micro-gap electrostatic discharge (ESD) events due to a human with charge voltages below 1000V cause serious malfunctions in high-tech information devices. For clarifying such a mechanism, it is indispensable to grasp the spark process of such micro-gap ESDs. For this purpose, two types of spark-resistance laws proposed by Rompe-Weizel and Toepler have often been used, which were derived from the hypotheses that spark conductivity be proportional to the internal energies and charges injected into a spark channel, respectively. However, their validity has not well been verified. To examine which spark-resistance formula could be applied for micro-gap ESDs, with a 12-GHz digital oscilloscope, we previously measured the discharge currents through the hand-held metal piece from a charged human with respect to charged voltages of 200V and 2000V, and thereby derived the conductance of a spark gap to reveal that both of their hypotheses are roughly valid in the initial stage of sparks. In this study, to further verify the above spark hypotheses, we derived the discharge voltages in closed forms across a spark gap based on the above spark-resistance formulae, and investigated which spark-resistance formula could be applied for micro-gap ESDs in comparison of spark gaps estimated from the measured discharge currents. As a result, we found that Rompe-Weizel's formula could well explain spark properties for micro-gap ESDs than Toepler's one regardless of charge voltages and approach speeds.

[1]  Stephan Frei,et al.  Computer simulation of ESD from voluminous objects compared to transient fields of humans , 2000 .

[2]  O. Fujiwara,et al.  Verification of spark resistance formula for human ESD , 2008, 2008 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility and 19th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[3]  Osamu Fujiwara,et al.  Further Validation of Spark-Resistance Formula Applied for Human ESD , 2009, 2009 20th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[4]  Osamu Fujiwara,et al.  Reconstruction of discharge currents injected on calibration target from electrostatic discharge generators , 2007, EMC 2007.

[5]  David Pommerenke,et al.  Modeling of short-gap ESD under consideration of different discharge mechanisms , 2003 .

[6]  Tomáš Ficker,et al.  Charging by walking , 2006 .

[7]  Osamu Fujiwara,et al.  Measurement of Discharge Current through Hand-held Metal Piece from Charged Human Body , 2005 .

[8]  David Pommerenke,et al.  FDTD modelling of nonlinear spark in electrostatic discharge , 1999 .

[9]  R. Rompe,et al.  Über das Toeplersche Funkengesetz , 1944 .

[10]  Osamu Fujiwara An Analytical Approach to Model Indirect Effect Caused by Electrostatic Discharge (Special Issue on Discharge and Electromagnetic Interference) , 1996 .

[11]  Osamu Fujiwara,et al.  Calculation of Ignition Noise Level Caused by Plug Gap Breakdown , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[12]  Jianqing Wang,et al.  Analytical approach to the spark resistance formula caused by electrostatic discharge , 1997 .