A computerized system to monitor resilience indicators in organizations.

The concepts developed by resilience engineering allow the understanding and monitoring the functioning of organizations and, particularly, to map the role of human activities, in success or in failure, enabling a better comprehension about how people make decisions in unexpected situations. The capture of information about human activities in the various organization levels gives managers a deeper real-time understanding of what is influencing the people performance, providing awareness of the factors that influence positively or negatively the organizational goals initially projected. The monitoring is important because the correct functioning of complex systems depends on the knowledge that people have to perform their activities and how the system environment provides tools that actually support the human performance. Therefore, organizations should look forward through precursors in operating signals to identify possible problems or solutions in the structure of tasks and activities, safety, quality, schedule, rework, and maintenance. We apply the concepts of resilience engineering to understand the organization by the analysis of cognitive tasks and activities. The aim is the development of a computerized system to monitor human activities to produce indicators to access system resilience. The validation of the approach was made in a real organization and the results show the successful applicability of the system. Based on findings obtained after the experiment of the system in a real organization, and managers and workers opinions, it was possible to show that the use of system provided an anticipated (real-time) perception about how activities are effectively being performed, allowing managers and workers to make decisions more consistent with daily problems, and also to anticipate solutions to cope with unexpected situations.

[1]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Risk, Human Error, and System Resilience: Fundamental Ideas , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Chronicling the Emergence of Confused Consensus , 2017 .

[3]  S. Johnsen Leading Indicators of Safety In Virtual Organizations , 2006 .

[4]  Christopher Nemeth,et al.  Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure , 2008 .

[5]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Human-computer interaction , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[6]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-of-the-Art Assessment , 2001, MIS Q..

[7]  R Monteforte Investigacion y desarrollo tecnologico en el sector electrico : el electric power research institute ( epri ) , 1991 .

[8]  Marcos R. S. Borges,et al.  Micro incident analysis framework to assess safety and resilience in the operation of safe critical systems: A case study in a nuclear power plant , 2008 .

[9]  Marcos R. S. Borges,et al.  Resilience and brittleness in the offshore helicopter transportation system: The identification of constraints and sacrifice decisions in pilots' work , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Gary Klein,et al.  Working Minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis , 2006 .

[11]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[12]  I. Svedung,et al.  Proactive Risk Management in a Dynamic Society , 2000 .

[13]  Manish Bansal,et al.  Business Dashboards: A Visual Catalog for Design and Deployment , 2009 .

[14]  Paulo Victor Rodrigues de Carvalho,et al.  Nuclear power plant communications in normative and actual practice: A field study of control room operators' communications , 2007 .