The case for a new energy research, development and promotion policy for the UK

This paper is a critical assessment of the current balance of efforts towards energy research and development (R&D) and the promotion of low-carbon electricity technologies in the UK. We review the UK's main technological options and their estimated cost ranges in the medium term. We contrast the energy R&D spending with the current and expected future cost of renewable promotion policies and point out the high cost of carbon saving through existing renewable promotion arrangements. We also note that liberalisation of the electricity sector has had significant implications for the landscape of energy R&D in the UK. We argue that there is a need for reappraisal of the soundness and balance of the energy R&D and renewable capacity deployment efforts towards new energy technologies. We suggest that the cost-effectiveness of UK deployment policies needs to be more closely analysed as associated costs are non-trivial and expected to rise. We also make a case for considering increasing the current low level of energy R&D expenditure. Much of energy R&D is a public good and we should consider whether the current organisation of R&D effort is fit for purpose. We argue that it is important to build and maintain the research capability in the UK in order to absorb spillovers of technological progress elsewhere in the world. Against this background, the recent signs that an energy R&D renaissance could be underway are therefore positive and welcome.

[1]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Delivering a low-carbon electricity system : technologies, economics, and policy , 2008 .

[2]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Future electricity technologies and systems , 2006 .

[3]  P D Henderson,et al.  Two British Errors: Their Probable Size and Some Possible Lessons , 1977 .

[4]  F. Sioshansi,et al.  Electricity market reform : an international perspective , 2006 .

[5]  Ambuj D. Sagar,et al.  Technological innovation in the energy sector : R&D, deployment, and learning-by-doing , 2006 .

[6]  V. Bush Science, the Endless Frontier , 1999, Science, the Endless Frontier.

[7]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Developing Nations, Energy R&D, and the Provision of a Planetary Public Good: A Long-Term Strategy for Addressing Climate Change , 2000 .

[8]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Technical Change Theory and Learning Curves: Patterns of Progress in Energy Technologies , 2006 .

[9]  Richard Green THE COST OF NUCLEAR POWER COMPARED WITH ALTERNATIVES TO THE MAGNOX PROGRAMME , 1995 .

[10]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Liberalisation and R&D in network industries: The case of the electricity industry , 2008 .

[11]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Technical Change Theory and Learning Curves: Patterns of Progress in Electricity Generation Technologies , 2007 .

[12]  H. Vos Trade and Industry , 1946 .

[13]  D. Kammen,et al.  Underinvestment: the energy technology and R&D policy challenge , 1999, Science.

[14]  Karsten Neuhoff,et al.  Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development , 2008 .

[15]  William J. Nuttall,et al.  Using Probabilistic Analysis to Value Power Generation Investments Under Uncertainty , 2006 .

[16]  D. Newbery,et al.  Calculating the Social Cost of Carbon , 2006 .

[17]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  The Restructuring and Privatisation of the CEGB: Was It Worth It? , 1996 .

[18]  D. Newbery,et al.  The restructuring and privatisation of Britain's CEGB--was it worth it? , 2003 .