Probabilistic forecasting of the 3-h ap index

Measurements of the solar wind are now available for nearly 40 years or four solar cycles. Several magnetic indexes are available for all of this time, and in most cases, some time before. Particle fluxes at geostationary orbit are available for nearly two solar cycles. Such data can be used to establish empirical relations between properties of the solar wind and indexes of magnetospheric and ionospheric activity. These relations are often expressed in terms of linear prediction filters, local linear filters, neural networks, or nonlinear transformations of solar wind data. The properties of these filters provide insight into the physical properties of the system and also can be used as real time predictors of future activity. All of these methods depend on real-time monitoring of the solar wind somewhere between the Earth's bow shock and the L1 point. Consequently, they provide no more than 1 h of advance warning. Longer term predictions depend on remote sensing of the Sun or solar wind and new models that transform these observations into properties of the solar wind at the Earth. Thus far, the only example of such remote sensing and empirical modeling is the Wang-Sheeley-Arge model. This model predicts the temporal profiles of solar wind speed, interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) magnitude, and IMF polarity at 1 AU. Unfortunately, geomagnetic activity indexes, and their prediction filters, also depend on the GSM Bz component of the IMF which so far is unpredictable. Fortunately, the solar wind often has large-scale structures that can be detected remotely. These structures organize the properties of the solar wind including IMF Bz, and hence affect the probability of geomagnetic activity at different times relative to the structure. Thus, it is possible to utilize the predictable properties of the solar wind to parameterize the probability distribution for a magnetic index and to accurately specify the probability of high geomagnetic activity given the correct identification of a solar wind structure.

[1]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  Predictability of Dst index based upon solar wind conditions monitored inside 1 AU , 1999 .

[2]  A. Ridley.  Estimations of the uncertainty in timing the relationship between magnetospheric and solar wind processes , 2000 .

[3]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Which magnetic storms produce relativistic electrons at geosynchronous orbit , 2001 .

[4]  Simulation of geomagnetic storms during the passage of magnetic clouds , 1995 .

[5]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling during intense magnetic storms (1978-1979) , 1989 .

[6]  Konstantinos Papadopoulos,et al.  Global and multi‐scale features of solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling: From modeling to forecasting , 2004 .

[7]  Robert L. McPherron,et al.  Probabilistic forecasting of geomagnetic indices using solar wind air mass analysis , 2004 .

[8]  R. McPherron,et al.  Seasonal and diurnal variation of Dst dynamics , 2002 .

[9]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  A description of the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling based on nonlinear filters , 1995 .

[10]  J. Phillips,et al.  Solar Wind Stream Interactions and the Wind Speed-Expansion Factor Relationship , 1997 .

[11]  D. Baker,et al.  The nonlinearity of models of the vB South‐AL coupling , 1996 .

[12]  J. Joselyn.  Geomagnetic activity forecasting: The state of the art , 1995 .

[13]  R. McPherron,et al.  An empirical phase space analysis of ring current dynamics: Solar wind control of injection and decay , 2000 .

[14]  C. Arge,et al.  Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near‐real time solar magnetic field updates , 2000 .

[15]  C. Russell,et al.  An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst , 1975 .

[16]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Magnetospheric Impulse Response for Many Levels of Geomagnetic Activity , 1985 .

[17]  J. T. Hoeksema,et al.  Prediction of the interplanetary magnetic field strength , 1995 .

[18]  William J. Burke,et al.  Variable time delays in the propagation of the interplanetary magnetic field , 2002 .

[19]  H. Gleisner,et al.  Response of the auroral electrojets to the solar wind modeled with neural networks , 1997 .

[20]  M. Altschuler,et al.  Solar sources of the interplanetary magnetic field and solar wind , 1977 .

[21]  W. Gonzalez.  A unified view of solar wind-magnetosphere coupling functions , 1990 .

[22]  N. Sheeley,et al.  Solar wind speed and coronal flux-tube expansion , 1990 .

[23]  Robert L. McPherron,et al.  Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity , 1973 .

[24]  Xinlin Li,et al.  A new model for the prediction of Dst on the basis of the solar wind , 2002 .

[25]  Scott C. Sheridan,et al.  The redevelopment of a weather‐type classification scheme for North America , 2002 .

[26]  M. Kivelson,et al.  Solar wind control of auroral zone geomagnetic activity , 1981 .

[27]  R. L. McPherron,et al.  Statistical asynchronous regression: Determining the relationship between two quantities that are not measured simultaneously , 2000, cond-mat/0005475.

[28]  P. Palmadesso,et al.  Real‐time identification and prediction of geoeffective solar wind structures , 1996 .

[29]  Statistical Asynchronous Regression , 2000 .

[30]  Henrik Lundstedt,et al.  Neural network modeling of solar wind‐magnetosphere interaction , 1997 .

[31]  D. Mccomas,et al.  Predicting interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) propagation delay times using the minimum variance technique , 2003 .

[32]  Peter J. Cargill,et al.  Predicting solar wind structures and their geoeffectiveness , 1997 .

[33]  T. B. Low,et al.  Development of air mass climatology analysis for the determination of characteristic marine atmospheres. Part I: North Atlantic , 1997 .