Face Concerns in Interpersonal Conflict

This study sought to test the underlying assumption of the face-negotiation theory that face is an explanatory mechanism for culture’s influence on conflict behavior. A questionnaire was administered to 768 participants in 4 national cultures (China, Germany, Japan, and the United States) asking them to describe interpersonal conflict. The major findings of this study are as follows: (a) cultural individualism-collectivism had direct and indirect effects on conflict styles, (b) independent self-construal related positively with self-face and interdependent self-construal related positively with other-face, (c) self-face related positively with dominating conflict styles and other-face related positively with avoiding and integrating styles, and (d) face accounted for all of the total variance explained (100% of 19% total explained) in dominating, most of the total variance explained in integrating (70% of 20% total explained), and some of the total variance explained in avoiding (38% of 21% total explained) when considering face concerns, cultural individualismcollectivism, and self-construals.

[1]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[2]  Mary M. Meares,et al.  Interpersonal conflict in organizations: Explaining conflict styles via face‐negotiation theory , 2003 .

[3]  J. Tedeschi,et al.  Cultural Values in Conflict Management , 1999 .

[4]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Face in Japan and the United States. , 1994 .

[5]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Negotiation in Social Conflict , 1993 .

[6]  R. Buda,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONFLICT STYLES ACROSS CULTURES , 1996 .

[7]  M. Rahim,et al.  A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[8]  Edward L. Fink,et al.  Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists , 2002 .

[9]  John e. Jones.  Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument , 1976 .

[10]  A. Panter,et al.  Writing about structural equation models. , 1995 .

[11]  John G. Oetzel,et al.  The effects of self‐construals and ethnicity on self‐reported conflict styles , 1998 .

[12]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations [2nd edition]: Geert Hofstede , 2005 .

[13]  Richard L. Harris,et al.  Face and Facework in Conflicts With Parents and Siblings: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Germans, Japanese, Mexicans, and U.S. Americans , 2003 .

[14]  Xiaohui Pan,et al.  Face and facework in conflict: a cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States , 2001 .

[15]  Richard West,et al.  Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application , 2000 .

[16]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Resolving interpersonal conflicts: An analysis of stylistic consistency. , 1987 .

[17]  E. Goffman.  On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. , 1955, Psychiatry.

[18]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[19]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Conflict and negotiation. , 1987 .

[20]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  Competence in Interpersonal Conflict , 1996 .

[21]  R. Hoyle.  Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[22]  Larry A. Samovar,et al.  Intercultural communication : a reader , 1972 .

[23]  John G. Oetzel,et al.  A typology of facework behaviors in conflicts with best friends and relative strangers , 2000 .

[24]  R. Bhagat.  Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[25]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  The Influence of Cultural Individualism-Collectivism, Self Construals, and Individual Values on Communication Styles Across Cultures , 1996 .

[26]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[27]  Stewart L. Tubbs,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication. , 1988 .

[28]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  Preferred Styles of Conflict Resolution , 1997 .

[29]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Theories in Intercultural Communication. , 1988 .

[30]  Stella Ting-Toomey.  The challenge of facework : cross-cultural and interpersonal issues , 1994 .

[31]  Stella Ting-Toomey,et al.  CULTURE, FACE MAINTENANCE, AND STYLES OF HANDLING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT: A STUDY IN FIVE CULTURES , 1991 .

[32]  H. Triandis.  Individualism And Collectivism , 1995 .

[33]  W J Brown,et al.  Culture, self, and collectivist communication: linking culture to individual behavior. , 1995, Human communication research.

[34]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[35]  Stella Ting-Toomey,et al.  Facework in Japan and the United States , 1994 .

[36]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[37]  Stella Ting-Toomey,et al.  Facework competence in intercultural conflict: an updated face-negotiation theory , 1998 .

[38]  Ge Gao,et al.  An initial analysis of the effects of face and concern for OTHER in chinese interpersonal communication , 1998 .

[39]  Catherine H. Tinsley,et al.  Models of conflict resolution in Japanese, German, and American cultures. , 1998 .

[40]  Thomas L. Ruble,et al.  Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior. , 1976 .

[41]  John G. Oetzel,et al.  Ethnic/cultural identity salience and conflict styles in four US ethnic groups , 2000 .

[42]  J. Hunter,et al.  Individual‐vs. culture‐level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: Effects on preferred conversational styles , 1996 .

[43]  J. Oetzel,et al.  Managing Intercultural Conflict Effectively , 2001 .