Analysis on the Effect of Multitasking

Recently, the ideas of switching cost and interruption function have been introduced in modeling the scheduling problems with multitasking and the effect of multitasking is investigated by computer simulations. In this paper, we analyze the effect of multitasking on the total completion time (TCT) and total weighted completion time (TWCT) by statistical analysis. If the cost of job switching is a constant and the amount of interruption is proportional to the remaining processing time of the interrupting job, the optimal TCT schedule can be obtained by the shortest processing time first (SPTF) rule. Thus, the optimal TCT in the presence of multitasking is derived and compared with the optimal TCT without multitasking. Assuming that the values of switching cost and the proportional constant are small, the optimal TWCT in the presence of multitasking is expressed and compared with the optimal TWCT without multitasking. With mild statistical assumptions on the processing times and weights, the expected TCT and TWCT are derived and the effect of multitasking on TCT (respectively TWCT) is analyzed by numerical plots against the switching cost and the proportional constant. Results reveal that multitasking could have significant effect on both the TCT and TWCT. Hence, multitasking should be avoided in a work place.

[1]  D. Strayer,et al.  Who Multi-Tasks and Why? Multi-Tasking Ability, Perceived Multi-Tasking Ability, Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  M. Wise The Multitasking Myth: Handling Complexity in Real-World Operations , 2012 .

[3]  Joseph Y.-T. Leung,et al.  The effects of multitasking on operations scheduling , 2015 .

[4]  Víctor M. González,et al.  No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work , 2005, CHI.

[5]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Jan Karel Lenstra,et al.  Complexity of machine scheduling problems , 1975 .

[7]  E. Lawler A “Pseudopolynomial” Algorithm for Sequencing Jobs to Minimize Total Tardiness , 1977 .

[8]  J. M. Moore An n Job, One Machine Sequencing Algorithm for Minimizing the Number of Late Jobs , 1968 .

[9]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems , 1972, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[10]  B. J. Lageweg,et al.  Computer-Aided complexity classification of combinational problems , 1982, CACM.

[11]  Jan Karel Lenstra,et al.  Complexity of Scheduling under Precedence Constraints , 1978, Oper. Res..

[12]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design , 1991 .

[13]  Roy Radner,et al.  On the allocation of effort , 1975 .

[14]  Herbert A. David,et al.  Order Statistics , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[15]  S. Monsell Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  D. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Sridhar Seshadri,et al.  Managerial Allocation of Time and Effort: The Effects of Interruptions , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Marc E. Posner,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Scheduling Problems , 2004, J. Sched..

[19]  B. E. Partridge,et al.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974 .

[21]  Frank J. Lee,et al.  Production Compilation: A Simple Mechanism to Model Complex Skill Acquisition , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Multitasking information seeking and searching processes , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  A. Ichino,et al.  Time Allocation and Task Juggling , 2014 .

[24]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: from concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption , 2009, CHI.

[25]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Multitasking information behavior and information task switching: an exploratory study , 2004, J. Documentation.

[26]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[27]  E. Lawler Sequencing Jobs to Minimize Total Weighted Completion Time Subject to Precedence Constraints , 1978 .

[28]  J. George,et al.  Work Interrupted: A Closer Look at the Role of Interruptions in Organizational Life , 2003 .

[29]  KC DiwasSingh,et al.  Does Multitasking Improve Performance? Evidence from the Emergency Department , 2014, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[30]  Diwas Singh KC,et al.  Does Multitasking Improve Performance? Evidence from the Emergency Department , 2013 .

[31]  Michael Pinedo,et al.  Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems , 1994 .

[32]  J. Sum,et al.  Operations Scheduling in the Presence of Multitasking and Symmetric Switching Cost , 2017 .

[33]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Multitasking Web searching and implications for design , 2003, ASIST.

[34]  J. Sum,et al.  Intractability of Operations Scheduling in the Presence of Multitasking , 2014 .

[35]  Robert McNaughton,et al.  Scheduling with Deadlines and Loss Functions , 1959 .

[36]  A. Allport,et al.  Bilingual Language Switching in Naming: Asymmetrical Costs of Language Selection , 1999 .

[37]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[38]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  E. Hallowell,et al.  Overloaded circuits: why smart people underperform. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[40]  Edwin A. J. van Hooft,et al.  Boredom at work: proximal and distal consequences of affective work-related boredom. , 2014, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[41]  Moshe Zukerman,et al.  Introduction to Queueing Theory and Stochastic Teletraffic Models , 2013, ArXiv.

[42]  Michael Rothschild,et al.  Further Notes on the Allocation of Effort , 1975 .

[43]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Multitasking during Web search sessions , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[44]  Eugene L. Lawler,et al.  Optimal Sequencing of a Single Machine Subject to Precedence Constraints , 1973 .

[45]  D. Atkin OR scheduling algorithms. , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[46]  D. Broadbent,et al.  What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity , 1989 .

[47]  D. Strayer,et al.  Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.