Hemisphere Specific Impairments in Reach-to-Grasp Control After Stroke: Effects of Object Size

Background and objective. The authors investigated hemispheric specialization for the visuomotor transformation of grasp preshaping and the coordination between transport and grasp in individuals poststroke. Based on a bilateral model, the authors hypothesized that after unilateral stroke there would be hemisphere-specific deficits revealed by the ipsilesional limb. Methods. Right or left stroke and age- and limb-matched nondisabled participants performed rapid reach-to-grasp of 3 sized objects. The authors quantified grasp preshaping as the correlation between initial aperture velocity and peak aperture, and peak aperture and object diameter. A cross correlation analysis using transport velocity and aperture size was performed to quantify transport-grasp coordination. All statistical tests for hemisphere-specific deficits involved comparisons between each stroke group and the matched nondisabled group. Results. Overall, the right stroke group, but not left stroke group, demonstrated prolonged movement time. For grasp preshaping there was a higher correlation between initial aperture velocity and peak aperture for the right stroke group and a lower correlation between peak aperture and object diameter for the left stroke group. For transport-grasp coordination the correlation between transport velocity and aperture size was higher for the left stroke group and lower for the right stroke group, which also demonstrated a higher standard deviation of time lag. Conclusions. After left stroke, there was deficient scaling of grasp preshaping and stronger transport-grasp coordination. In contrast, after right stroke, grasp preshaping began earlier and transport-grasp coordination was weaker. Together, these hemisphere-specific deficits suggest a left hemisphere specialization for the visuomotor transformation of grasp preshaping and a right hemisphere specialization for transport-grasp coordination.

[1]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  A Dissociation between the Representation of Tool-use Skills and Hand Dominance: Insights from Left- and Right-handed Callosotomy Patients , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Manual and hemispheric asymmetries in the execution of actual and pantomimed prehension , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  D. Harrington,et al.  The role of the hemispheres in closed loop movements , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[6]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Does motor lateralization have implications for stroke rehabilitation? , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  R. Sainburg.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  D. Harrington,et al.  Limb-Sequencing Deficits After Left but not Right Hemisphere Damage , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  R. Ivry,et al.  The two sides of perception , 1997 .

[11]  R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: the effect of stimulus category , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Philippe S. Archambault,et al.  Hemispheric specialization in the co-ordination of arm and trunk movements during pointing in patients with unilateral brain damage , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: hemispheric asymmetry and handedness. , 1993, Science.

[15]  M Hallett,et al.  Dissociation of the pathways mediating ipsilateral and contralateral motor‐evoked potentials in human hand and arm muscles , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  A Review of Hemispheric Asymmetry: What's Right and What's Left , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  U. Castiello.  The neuroscience of grasping , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  G Schlaug,et al.  Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements , 2004, Neurology.

[21]  C. Winstein,et al.  Sensory-motor control in the ipsilesional upper extremity after stroke. , 1997, NeuroRehabilitation.

[22]  M. Goodale.  Hemispheric differences in motor control , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Deborah L. Harrington,et al.  The effects of task complexity on motor performance in left and right CVA patients , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Roland R. Lee,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  J. Bamford,et al.  Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction , 1991, The Lancet.

[29]  D. Harrington,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of movement , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Effects of unilateral brain damage on grip selection, coordination, and kinematics of ipsilesional prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Prehension With the Ipsilesional Hand After Unilateral Brain Damage , 1999, Cortex.

[32]  Joseph D. Cohen,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry in a dissociation between the visuomotor and visuoperceptual streams , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[34]  A Urbano,et al.  Human cortical activity related to unilateral movements. A high resolution EEG study , 1996, Neuroreport.

[35]  James Gordon,et al.  Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport–grasp coordination , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  P. Mazzone,et al.  Intracortical origin of the short latency facilitation produced by pairs of threshold magnetic stimuli applied to human motor cortex , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Mieke Verfaellie,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for selective attention apparent only with increased task demands in healthy participants , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[38]  Michelle Harris-Love,et al.  High level bilateral talks. Focus on "effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on interhemispheric inhibition". , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Reach-to-grasp movements during obstacle avoidance , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Ipsilateral motor cortex activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging during unilateral hand movements is related to interhemispheric interactions , 2003, NeuroImage.

[41]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension , 1991, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  Julie Duque,et al.  Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke , 2005, NeuroImage.

[43]  E. Zaidel,et al.  Individual differences in lateralization: effects of gender and handedness. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[44]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task , 1990 .

[45]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[46]  M. Peters,et al.  Prolonged Practice of a Simple Motor Task by Preferred and Nonpreferred Hands , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[47]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Handedness: Differential Specializations for Control of Trajectory and Position , 2005, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[48]  B R Rosen,et al.  Activation of distinct motor cortex regions during ipsilateral and contralateral finger movements. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  C. Winstein,et al.  Qualitative dynamics of disordered human locomotion: a preliminary investigation. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[50]  M. Hallett,et al.  Cortical motor representation of the ipsilateral hand and arm , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  Deborah L. Harrington,et al.  Hemispheric control of the initial and corrective components of aiming movements , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  E. Jankowska,et al.  How Can Corticospinal Tract Neurons Contribute to Ipsilateral Movements? A Question With Implications for Recovery of Motor Functions , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[53]  B. Christensen,et al.  The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[54]  C. J. Winstein,et al.  Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  Alice C. Roy,et al.  Visuo-motor control of the ipsilateral hand: evidence from right brain-damaged patients , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.