Principles of quantitative positron emission tomography

The central distinguishing feature of positron emission tomography (PET) is its ability to investigate quantitatively regional cellular and molecular transport processes in vivo with good spatial resolution. This review wants to provide a concise overview of the established principles underlying quantitative data evaluations of the acquired PET images. Especially, the compartment modelling framework is discussed on which virtually all quantification methods utilized in PET are based. The aim of the review is twofold: first, to provide the reader with an idea of the theoretical framework and mathematical tools and second, to enable an intuitive grasp of the possibilities and limitations of a quantitative approach to PET data evaluation. This should facilitate an understanding of how PET measurements translate into quantities such as regional blood flow, volume of distribution, and metabolic rates of specific substrates.

[1]  G Blomqvist,et al.  On the Construction of Functional Maps in Positron Emission Tomography , 1984, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[2]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[3]  S. Kety,et al.  THE NITROUS OXIDE METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW IN MAN: THEORY, PROCEDURE AND NORMAL VALUES. , 1948, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  R. P. Maguire,et al.  PET Pharmacokinetic Course , 2003 .

[5]  Nicola Fox,et al.  Cardiovascular system. , 2007, Nursing Standard.

[6]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[7]  J. Bassingthwaighte,et al.  Potassium and thallium uptake in dog myocardium. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  G J Meyer,et al.  Accurate local blood flow measurements with dynamic PET: fast determination of input function delay and dispersion by multilinear minimization. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Tracer Kinetic Modeling in PET , 2005 .

[10]  James B. Bassingthwaighte,et al.  Computationally efficient algorithms for convection-permeation-diffusion models for blood-tissue exchange , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  J B Bassingthwaighte,et al.  Estimation of blood flow with radioactive tracers. , 1976, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[12]  David J. Schlyer,et al.  Graphical Analysis of Reversible Radioligand Binding from Time—Activity Measurements Applied to [N-11C-Methyl]-(−)-Cocaine PET Studies in Human Subjects , 1990, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[13]  J. van den Hoff,et al.  Fundamentals of quantitative PET data analysis. , 2002, Current pharmaceutical design.

[14]  N. Lassen,et al.  Tracer kinetic methods in medical physiology , 1979 .

[15]  J B Bassingthwaighte,et al.  Physiology and theory of tracer washout techniques for the estimation of myocardial blood flow: flow estimation from tracer washout. , 1977, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.