Optimization of histotripsy for kidney stone erosion

Previous work has demonstrated that histotripsy can effectively comminute model kidney stones, eroding them to sub-100 µm particulate debris via a cavitational bubble cloud. We now focus on optimization of the histotripsy parameter space and treatment strategies to yield optimal stone erosion. Ultracal-30 model stones were sonicated using a 750 kHz piezocomposite transducer. Pulses of 5 cycles in duration delivered at pulse repetition frequencies (PRFs) of 10 Hz, 100 Hz, and 1 kHz were tested. For each PRF, the erosion characteristics were investigated at increasing intensity levels corresponding to peak negative pressures (p-) of 10, 15, 19, 22, and 26 MPa. Additionally, the effect of exposed stone surface area was explored through the treatment of the same model stones that were first mechanically sectioned into 1/8's. Results show the following: (1) At PRF of 10 Hz, stone erosion rate was observed to increase linearly with p-; at 100 Hz and 1 kHz, erosion rate saturation was observed. (2) Increasing the PRF at a given intensity resulted in an increase in stone erosion; however, a 10fold increase in PRF did not produce an equivalent 10-fold increase in erosion rate. (3) Treatment of model stones sectioned into 1/8's produced a 2-fold rate increase relative to their unsectioned counterparts. (4) The maximum observed histotripsy stone treatment rate (88 mg/min) rivals that previously measured for a piezoelectric lithotripter (111 mg/min); this fact, coupled with histotripsy being a surface erosion phenomenon that produces ultra-fine debris, suggests that histotripsy offers a potential adjunct to conventional shock wave lithotripsy.

[1]  Michael R. Bailey,et al.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy , 2005, Urological Research.

[2]  C. Cain,et al.  In vitro comminution of model renal calculi using histotripsy , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Thomas Knoll,et al.  5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. , 2005, European urology.

[4]  Akira Ito,et al.  High intensity focused ultrasound lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[5]  Pei Zhong,et al.  The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  C. Chaussy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: New Aspects in the Treatment of Kidney Stone Disease , 1982 .

[7]  C. Cain,et al.  Histotripsy erosion of model urinary calculi. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[8]  M. Delius Minimal static excess pressure minimises the effect of extracorporeal shock waves on cells and reduces it on gallstones. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  W. Roberts,et al.  Non-invasive comminution of renal calculi using pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy - histotripsy , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[10]  Khaled Z Sheir,et al.  Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones. , 2006, Journal of endourology.

[11]  R. Paterson,et al.  In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotriptors. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[12]  J. Mcateer,et al.  Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. , 2006, Journal of endourology.