Too much Emphasis on Research? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Research and Teaching in Multitasking Environments

Abstract While the public is concerned that emphasizing research performance among university faculty results in inadequate attention to undergraduate teaching, research on the relationship between research and teaching in higher education has failed to confirm or deny the validity of this concern. To empirically test this popular concern, we examined how the change in performance-based incentive systems to improve faculty publications influenced student evaluations of their teaching in a Korean university. The analysis of a panel dataset of individual faculty members shows that financial incentives on research rather than teaching could have redirected attention of some professors from teaching to research, thus reducing teaching quality, as proposed by advocates of multitasking theory. Therefore, these findings suggest that, when multiple tasks are significant to organizational values, the incentive structure must assure that each task or activity offers professors the same marginal return on their efforts.

[1]  Do Han Kim,et al.  How Do Scientists Respond to Performance-Based Incentives? Evidence From South Korea , 2016 .

[2]  B. Clark.  Places of Inquiry: Research and Advanced Education in Modern Universities , 1997 .

[3]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  The graying of academia: will it reduce scientific productivity? , 2010, The American psychologist.

[4]  Kiyong Byun,et al.  Quest for building world-class universities in South Korea: outcomes and consequences , 2013 .

[5]  P. Courty,et al.  Curbing Cream-Skimming: Evidence on Enrolment Incentives , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  K. Feldman.  Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration , 1987 .

[7]  S. Burgess,et al.  The Role of Incentives in the Public Sector: Issues and Evidence , 2003 .

[8]  Robert K. Toutkoushian,et al.  Using Publications Counts to Measure an Institution's Research Productivity , 2003 .

[9]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  Academic capitalism and the new economy : markets, state, and higher education , 2009 .

[10]  Tatiana Melguizo,et al.  Faculty Salaries and the Maximization of Prestige , 2007 .

[11]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Changing Incentives to Publish , 2011, Science.

[12]  John M. Braxton.  Contrasting perspectives on the relationship between teaching and research , 1996 .

[13]  Frank H. T. Rhodes.  The Creation of the Future: The Role of the American University , 2001 .

[14]  M. Malcolm,et al.  A critical evaluation of recent progress in understanding the role of the research-teaching link in higher education , 2014 .

[15]  A. Ichino,et al.  Absenteeism and Employment Protection: Three Case Studies * , 2004 .

[16]  Avinash Dixit,et al.  # Incentives and Organizations in the Public Sector: An Interpretative Review , 2002 .

[17]  B. Frey.  Not Just for the Money , 1997 .

[18]  B. Newman,et al.  Findings from a National Survey , 2016 .

[19]  J. Freedman.  Liberal Education and the Public Interest , 2003 .

[20]  L. Butler,et al.  Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .

[21]  Gerald Marschke,et al.  Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems , 2010 .

[22]  James A. Brickley,et al.  Changing incentives in a multitask environment: evidence from a top-tier business school , 2001 .

[23]  Charles J. Sykes,et al.  Professors as the New Deviants: "Profscam" and American Higher Education@@@Profscam: Professors and the Demise of Higher Education , 1988 .

[24]  Ellen Hazelkorn,et al.  Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education , 2011 .

[25]  Uwe Wilkesmann,et al.  The impacts of new governance on teaching at German universities. Findings from a national survey , 2012 .

[26]  K. Arrow.  Higher education as a filter , 1973 .

[27]  H. Rainey.  Understanding and Managing Public Organizations , 1991 .

[28]  E. Kokkelenberg,et al.  The Effects of Class Size on Student Grades at a Public University , 2008 .

[29]  R. Blackburn.  The meaning of work in academia , 1974 .

[30]  P. Abrami,et al.  Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research , 1987 .

[31]  David Kember,et al.  Disciplinary Differences in Student Ratings of Teaching Quality , 2011 .

[32]  Marilyn Strathern,et al.  Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy , 2000 .

[33]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design , 1991 .

[34]  P. Markie.  A Professor's Duties: Ethical Issues in College Teaching , 1994 .

[35]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .

[36]  G. Baker.  Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[37]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Entrepreneurial science: the second academic revolution , 1998 .

[38]  Lotte Bøgh Andersen,et al.  “Not Just for the Money?” How Financial Incentives Affect the Number of Publications at Danish Research Institutions , 2008 .

[39]  Peter Kuhn,et al.  Making Nutritional Information Digestible : Effects of a Receipt-Based Intervention on Fast Food Purchases , 2013 .

[40]  Jung Cheol Shin,et al.  The Past, Present, and Future of University Rankings , 2011 .

[41]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Motivational Bases of Public Service , 1990 .

[42]  Jaroslav Jan Pelikan,et al.  The Idea of the University: A Reexamination , 1993 .

[43]  B. Frey.  Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation , 1998 .

[44]  Ulrich Teichler,et al.  University rankings : theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education , 2011 .

[45]  John Hattie,et al.  The Relationship Between Research and Teaching: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[46]  John Hattie,et al.  The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness , 2002 .

[47]  Paula E. Stephan.  How Economics Shapes Science , 2012 .

[48]  David M. Van Slyke,et al.  Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship , 2006 .

[49]  Carol L. Colbeck,et al.  Merging in a Seamless Blend: How Faculty Integrate Teaching and Research. , 1998 .

[50]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[51]  John N. Friedman,et al.  Performance Improvement and Performance Dysfunction: An Empirical Examination of Impacts of the Emergency Room Wait-Time Target in the English National Health Service , 2007 .

[52]  W. Vandenabeele,et al.  Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation , 2007 .

[53]  David Boud,et al.  Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with learning , 1995 .

[54]  Rebecca Brent,et al.  Does Faculty Research Improve Undergraduate Teaching? An Analysis of Existing and Potential Synergies , 2007 .

[55]  B. Frey,et al.  Being independent raises happiness at work , 2004 .

[56]  Deborah L. Rhode.  In Pursuit of Knowledge: Scholars, Status, and Academic Culture , 2006 .

[57]  E. Deci,et al.  Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again , 2001 .

[58]  A. Astin.  What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .