Joint Capabilities and System-of-Systems Solutions: A Case for Crossing Solution Domains

Abstract : Recognizing the need to succeed in a new multilateral, asymmetric threat environment, the U.S. Department of Defense has initiated a radical transformation in operations to promote agility and enhance responsiveness. The transformation process, as well as the resulting new order of operations, relies heavily on system-of-systems solutions to bridge existing gaps in operations. To date, a pervasive, and possibly detrimental, assumption has dominated the program management arena: management tools and methods that work for single systems apply equally well to the acquisition of system-of-systems solutions. This technical note questions the general assumption that single-system methods are effective in a system-of-systems arena. Taking the position that the field, as a whole, lacks an adequate understanding of the unique challenges that influence system-of-systems initiatives, this report presents a case for the investigation and adaptation of structural and dynamic modeling techniques to the engineering of systems of systems. The report also includes results from a survey of subject matter experts providing evidence that resource expenditures in areas important to a system-of-systems environment are becoming high priorities.

[1]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Managing the Unknowable : The Strategic Boundaries Between Order and Chaos , 1992 .

[2]  Mary Maureen Brown,et al.  Illuminating Patterns of Perception: An Overview of Q Methodology , 2004 .

[3]  Harold Greene,et al.  Lessons Learned From Developing the ABCS 6.4 Solution , 2005 .

[4]  H. Dieter Rombach Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Software engineering , 1996, ICSE 1996.

[5]  Richard K. Sylvester,et al.  Conflict and Ambiguity: Implementing Evolutionary Acquisition , 2003 .

[6]  John M. Shalikashvili Joint Vision 2010 , 1997 .

[7]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  Assessment of water resources through system dynamics simulation: from global issues to regional solutions , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[8]  J. Forrester System Dynamics and the Lessons of 35 Years , 1993 .

[9]  T. P. Hughes Rescuing Prometheus: Four Monumental Projects That Changed the Modern World , 1998 .

[10]  James M. Lyneis,et al.  System dynamics for business strategy: a phased approach , 1999 .

[11]  Dietmar Pfahl,et al.  IMMoS: a methodology for integrated measurement, modelling and simulation , 2002, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[12]  W. Anderson,et al.  Revealing Cost Drivers for Systems Integration and Interoperability Through Q Methodology , 2004 .

[13]  Anette J. Kriengle Behind the Wizard's Curtain: An Integration Environment for a System of Systems , 1999 .

[14]  G. Michael McGrath,et al.  Implementing recommendations as a result of a system dynamics intervention , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Gerald M. Weinberg,et al.  Quality Software Management Volume 1: Systems Thinking , 1991 .

[16]  M. Pursley Report Documentation Page Form Approved Omb No. 0704-0188 Please Do Not Return Your Form to the above Address. 1. Report Date (dd-mm-yyyy) Final Technical Report Receiver Statistics for Cognitive Radios in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks Onr , 2007 .

[17]  Mary Maureen Brown,et al.  Joint Capabilities and System-of-Systems Solutions , 2005 .

[18]  Rick Kazman,et al.  Toward a discipline of scenario‐based architectural engineering , 2000, Ann. Softw. Eng..

[19]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  System Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems , 2006 .

[20]  Richard E. Hayes,et al.  Power to the Edge: Command, Control in the Information Age , 2003 .

[21]  Raymond J. Madachy System dynamics modeling of an inspection-based process , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[22]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..