Self-organizing Flows in Social Networks

Social networks offer users new means of accessing information, essentially relying on "social filtering", i.e. propagation and filtering of information by social contacts. The sheer amount of data flowing in these networks, combined with the limited budget of attention of each user, makes it difficult to ensure that social filtering brings relevant content to interested users. Our motivation in this paper is to measure to what extent self-organization of a social network results in efficient social filtering. To this end we introduce flow games, a simple abstraction that models network formation under selfish user dynamics, featuring user-specific interests and budget of attention. In the context of homogeneous user interests, we show that selfish dynamics converge to a stable network structure (namely a pure Nash equilibrium) with close-to-optimal information dissemination. We show that, in contrast, for the more realistic case of heterogeneous interests, selfish dynamics may lead to information dissemination that can be arbitrarily inefficient, as captured by an unbounded "price of anarchy". Nevertheless the situation differs when user interests exhibit a particular structure, captured by a metric space with low doubling dimension. In that case, natural autonomous dynamics converge to a stable configuration. Moreover, users obtain all the information of interest to them in the corresponding dissemination, provided their budget of attention is logarithmic in the size of their interest set.

[1]  Scott Shenker,et al.  On a network creation game , 2003, PODC '03.

[2]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation , 2000 .

[3]  D. Malkhi,et al.  LAND: stretch (1 + ε) locality-aware networks for DHTs , 2004, SODA '04.

[4]  Laurent Viennot,et al.  The Inframetric Model for the Internet , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[5]  R. Rosenthal A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria , 1973 .

[6]  D. Black The theory of committees and elections , 1959 .

[7]  Kenneth L. Clarkson,et al.  Nearest Neighbor Queries in Metric Spaces , 1999, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[8]  Sariel Har-Peled,et al.  Fast construction of nets in low dimensional metrics, and their applications , 2004, SCG.

[9]  L. Shapley,et al.  REGULAR ARTICLEPotential Games , 1996 .

[10]  Rajmohan Rajaraman,et al.  Accessing Nearby Copies of Replicated Objects in a Distributed Environment , 1999, Theory of Computing Systems.

[11]  Silvio Lattanzi,et al.  Filter & follow: how social media foster content curation , 2014, SIGMETRICS '14.

[12]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  The Price of Stability for Network Design with Fair Cost Allocation , 2004, FOCS.

[13]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.

[14]  Laurent Viennot,et al.  Acyclic Preference Systems in P2P Networks , 2007, Euro-Par.

[15]  Wei Chen,et al.  Bounded budget betweenness centrality game for strategic network formations , 2011, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[16]  Taher H. Haveliwala Topic-Sensitive PageRank: A Context-Sensitive Ranking Algorithm for Web Search , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[17]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  The complexity of pure Nash equilibria , 2004, STOC '04.

[18]  Rajmohan Rajaraman,et al.  Bounded budget connection (BBC) games or how to make friends and influence people, on a budget , 2008, PODC '08.

[19]  George Giakkoupis Tight Bounds for Rumor Spreading with Vertex Expansion , 2014, SODA.

[20]  David R. Karger,et al.  Finding nearest neighbors in growth-restricted metrics , 2002, STOC '02.

[21]  T. Roughgarden Potential functions and the inefficiency of equilibria , 2006 .

[22]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  Rate-optimal schemes for Peer-to-Peer live streaming , 2008, Perform. Evaluation.

[23]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  How to Optimally allocate your budget of attention in social networks , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[24]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.