Unconscious cueing effects in saccadic eye movements – Facilitation and inhibition in temporal and nasal hemifield

The current study investigated whether subliminal spatial cues can affect the oculomotor system. In addition, we performed the experiment under monocular viewing conditions. By limiting participants to monocular viewing conditions, we can examine behavioral temporal-nasal hemifield asymmetries. These behavioral asymmetries may arise from an anatomical asymmetry in the retinotectal pathway. The results show that even though our spatial cues were not consciously perceived they did affect the oculomotor system: relative to the neutral condition, saccade latencies to the validly cued location were shorter and saccade latencies to the invalidly cued location were longer. Although we did not observe an overall inhibition of return effect, there was a reliable effect of hemifield on IOR for those observers who showed an overall IOR effect. More specifically, consistent with the notion that processing via the retinotectal pathway is stronger in the temporal hemifield than in the nasal hemifield we found an IOR effect for cues presented in the temporal hemifield but not for cues presented in the nasal hemifield. We conclude that unconsciously processed spatial cues can affect the oculomotor system. In addition, the observed behavioral temporal-nasal hemifield asymmetry is consistent with retinotectal mediation.

[1]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Correlates of Capture of Attention and Inhibition of Return across Stages of Visual Processing , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Pattern of neuronal activity associated with conscious and unconscious processing of visual signals. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  G. Woodman,et al.  Dissociations Among Attention, Perception, and Awareness During Object-Substitution Masking , 2003, Psychological science.

[5]  Neelam Naikar,et al.  A new component of visual orienting: Implicit effects of peripheral information and subthreshold cues on covert attention , 1999 .

[6]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Attending to the thalamus: inhibition of return and nasal‐temporal asymmetry in the pulvinar , 2002, Neuroreport.

[7]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The Influence of Blind Distractors on Eye Movement Trajectories in Visual Hemifield Defects , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  Petroc Sumner,et al.  Naso-temporal asymmetry for signals invisible to the retinotectal pathway. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Fahle,et al.  Naso-temporal asymmetry of visual perception and of the visual cortex , 1988, Vision Research.

[11]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Visual FMRI responses in human superior colliculus show a temporal-nasal asymmetry that is absent in lateral geniculate and visual cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  A Cohen,et al.  Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field. , 1990, Science.

[13]  C. Ávila.  Facilitation and inhibition of visual orienting as a function of personality , 1995 .

[14]  S. Levay,et al.  The complete pattern of ocular dominance stripes in the striate cortex and visual field of the macaque monkey , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Sherman.  Visual Fields of Cats with Cortical and Tectal Lesions , 1974, Science.

[16]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[17]  P. Sumner.  Inhibition versus attentional momentum in cortical and collicular mechanisms of IOR , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  T. Ro.  Unconscious vision in action , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[20]  D. Munoz.  Commentary: saccadic eye movements: overview of neural circuitry. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[21]  P. McCormick.  Orienting attention without awareness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  A. Cowey,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells that project to the superior colliculus and pretectum in the macaque monkey , 1984, Neuroscience.

[23]  L. Weiskrantz.  Blindsight : a case study and implications , 1986 .

[24]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[25]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  Masking Disrupts Reentrant Processing in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Tony Ro,et al.  Unconscious processing of orientation and color without primary visual cortex. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Klein,et al.  Contribution of the Primate Superior Colliculus to Inhibition of Return , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Raymond M Klein,et al.  Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurement-induced attentional control settings. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[29]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Attention without awareness in blindsight , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  14 Attention and the Control of Movements , 1980 .

[31]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  Tony Ro,et al.  Extrageniculate mediation of unconscious vision in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced blindsight. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of visual attention in progressive supranuclear palsy. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Extrageniculate Contributions to Reflex Visual Orienting in Normal Humans: A Temporal Hemifield Advantage , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  R Fendrich,et al.  Inhibitory tagging of locations in the blind field of hemianopic patients. , 1997, Consciousness and cognition.

[38]  U. Ansorge.  Asymmetric influences of temporally vs. nasally presented masked visual information: Evidence for collicular contributions to nonconscious priming effects , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  C. Umilta,et al.  Inhibition of return in newborns is temporo-nasal asymmetrical , 1995 .

[40]  P. Sumner.  Negative and positive masked-priming – implications for motor inhibition , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[41]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[42]  D. Munoz,et al.  On your mark, get set: Brainstem circuitry underlying saccadic initiation , 2000 .

[43]  H. Deubel,et al.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[45]  J. Sprague,et al.  Interaction of Cortex and Superior Colliculus in Mediation of Visually Guided Behavior in the Cat , 1966, Science.

[46]  R. Rafal,et al.  A temporal/nasal asymmetry for blindsight in a localisation task: evidence for extrageniculate mediation , 2002, Neuroreport.

[47]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues , 2007 .

[48]  M Eimer,et al.  A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  D. Maurer,et al.  The oculomotor distractor effect in normal and hemianopic vision , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  A. Cowey,et al.  Nasal and temporal retinal ganglion cells projecting to the midbrain: Implications for “blindsight” , 1995, Neuroscience.

[51]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Using auditory and visual stimuli to investigate the behavioral and neuronal consequences of reflexive covert orienting. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  C. Kennard,et al.  Distinct Cortical and Collicular Mechanisms of Inhibition of Return Revealed with S Cone Stimuli , 2004, Current Biology.

[53]  Thom Carney,et al.  Orientation discrimination as a function of stimulus eccentricity and size: Nasal/temporal retinal asymmetry , 1988, Vision Research.

[54]  D. Vorberg,et al.  The time course of response inhibition in masked priming , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  S. Shipp.  The brain circuitry of attention , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.