Limbal and Bulbar Hyperaemia in Normal Eyes

Purpose:  To investigate the appearance of limbal and bulbar hyperaemia in normal eyes, their relationship and the inter‐observer agreement of clinical grading.

[1]  N. Efron,et al.  Grading static versus dynamic images of contact lens complications , 2007, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[2]  L. Jones,et al.  Assessment of Variation in Bulbar Conjunctival Redness, Temperature, and Blood Flow , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  R. Woods,et al.  How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia , 2007, Eye.

[4]  Luigina Sorbara,et al.  Comparison of an objective method of measuring bulbar redness to the use of traditional grading scales. , 2007, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[5]  L. Jones,et al.  Objective and Subjective Responses in Patients Refitted to Daily-Wear Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  J. Woods,et al.  The influence of lens conditioning on signs and symptoms with new hydrogel contact lenses , 2004, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[7]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Incremental nature of anterior eye grading scales determined by objective image analysis , 2004, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[8]  Brien A Holden,et al.  Altered Conjunctival Response After Contact Lens–Related Corneal Inflammation , 2003, Cornea.

[9]  L. Carney,et al.  Experience and training as determinants of grading reliability when assessing the severity of contact lens complications. , 2003, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[10]  J. Wolffsohn,et al.  Clinical monitoring of ocular physiology using digital image analysis. , 2003, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[11]  F. Malet,et al.  Clinical Results Comparing High-Oxygen and Low-Oxygen Permeable Soft Contact Lenses In France , 2003, Eye & contact lens.

[12]  P. Morgan,et al.  The combined influence of knowledge, training and experience when grading contact lens complications , 2003, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  D. Sweeney.  Clinical Signs of Hypoxia with High-Dk Soft Lens Extended Wear: Is the Cornea Convinced? , 2003, Eye & contact lens.

[14]  M. Aasuri,et al.  Differential Diagnosis of Microbial Keratitis and Contact Lens-Induced Peripheral Ulcer , 2003, Eye & contact lens.

[15]  Nathan Efron,et al.  Validation of computer morphs for grading contact lens complications , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  N. Brennan,et al.  A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[17]  A. Solomon,et al.  Pro- and anti-inflammatory forms of interleukin-1 in the tear fluid and conjunctiva of patients with dry-eye disease. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  D Fonn,et al.  Vascular Response to Extended Wear of Hydrogel Lenses with High and Low Oxygen Permeability , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  R. Woods,et al.  Clinical Grading of the Upper Palpebral Conjunctiva of Non-Contact Lens Wearers , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  Nathan Efron,et al.  Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[21]  J. Albietz.  Dry eye: an update on clinical diagnosis, management and promising new treatments , 2001, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[22]  C STEVEN BAILEY,et al.  Contact Lens Complications , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  F. Stapleton,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus causes acute inflammatory episodes in the cornea during contact lens wear , 2000, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[24]  Trefford Simpson,et al.  The Repeatability of Discrete and Continuous Anterior Segment Grading Scales , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  E. Papas.  Key factors in the subjective and objective assessment of conjunctival erythema. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  J. Sparrow,et al.  Decimalization of the Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System , 2000, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[27]  E. Papas,et al.  On the relationship between soft contact lens oxygen transmissibility and induced limbal hyperaemia. , 1998, Experimental eye research.

[28]  N Efron,et al.  Grading scales for contact lens complications , 1998, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[29]  M Guillon,et al.  Objective Measurement of Contact Lens-Induced Conjunctival Redness , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  W. Long,et al.  Characteristics of corneal staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[31]  T Grant,et al.  CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  C. McMonnies,et al.  Conjunctival hyperaemia in non‐contact lens wearers , 1991, Acta ophthalmologica.

[33]  R Barbeito,et al.  Should level of measurement considerations affect the choice of statistic? , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[34]  I L Bailey,et al.  Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  C. McMonnies,et al.  Assessment of Conjunctival Hyperemia in Contact Lens Wearers. Part I , 1987, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[36]  C W McMonnies,et al.  Assessment of Conjunctival Hyperemia in Contact Lens Wearers. Part II , 1987, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[37]  Mandell Rb,et al.  Slit lamp classification system. , 1987 .

[38]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[39]  C W McMonnies,et al.  The Vascular Response to Contact Lens Wear , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[40]  R. Woods,et al.  Clinical grading of corneal staining of non-contact lens wearers. , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[41]  B. Holden,et al.  High-oxygen-transmissibility soft contact lenses do not induce limbal hyperaemia. , 1997, Current eye research.

[42]  R. Woods.  Quantitative slit lamp observations in contact lens practice , 1989 .

[43]  R. Mandell.  Slit lamp classification system. , 1987, Journal of the American Optometric Association.