ON THE ORIGIN OF MODULAR VARIATION

Abstract We study the dynamics of modularization in a minimal substrate. A module is a functional unit relatively separable from its surrounding structure. Although it is known that modularity is useful both for robustness and for evolvability (Wagner 1996), there is no quantitative model describing how such modularity might originally emerge. Here we suggest, using simple computer simulations, that modularity arises spontaneously in evolutionary systems in response to variation, and that the amount of modular separation is logarithmically proportional to the rate of variation. Consequently, we predict that modular architectures would appear in correlation with high environmental change rates. Because this quantitative model does not require any special substrate to occur, it may also shed light on the origin of modular variation in nature. This observed relationship also indicates that modular design is a generic phenomenon that might be applicable to other fields, such as engineering: Engineering design methods based on evolutionary simulation would benefit from evolving to variable, rather than stationary, fitness criteria, as a weak and problem‐independent method for inducing modularity.

[1]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Binary Matrices in System Modeling , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  R. Lande.  The Genetic Covariance between Characters Maintained by Pleiotropic Mutations. , 1980, Genetics.

[3]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  Jeffrey S. Levinton,et al.  Genetics, paleontology, and macroevolution , 2001 .

[5]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[6]  P. Callaerts,et al.  Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. , 1995, Science.

[7]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  An introduction to genetic algorithms , 1996 .

[8]  L. Altenberg,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  G. Wagner.  HOMOLOGUES, NATURAL KINDS AND THE EVOLUTION OF MODULARITY , 1996 .

[10]  D. Waxman,et al.  Pleiotropy and the preservation of perfection. , 1998, Science.

[11]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Modularity in design of products and systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[12]  Sam Weerahandi,et al.  Exact Statistical Methods for Data Analysis , 1998, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[13]  P. Holland.  The future of evolutionary developmental biology , 1999, Nature.

[14]  C. Niehrs,et al.  Synexpression groups in eukaryotes , 1999, Nature.

[15]  Christopher C. Moser,et al.  Natural engineering principles of electron tunnelling in biological oxidation–reduction , 1999, Nature.

[16]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[17]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[18]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Automatic design and manufacture of robotic lifeforms , 2000, Nature.

[19]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Symbiotic Combination as an Alternative to Sexual Recombination in Genetic Algorithms , 2000, PPSN.

[20]  N. Forbes,et al.  Life as it could be: Alife attempts to simulate evolution , 2000 .

[21]  S. Carroll.  Chance and necessity: the evolution of morphological complexity and diversity , 2001, Nature.

[22]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  Exact Statistical Methods for Data Analysis , 2001, Technometrics.

[23]  R. Langlois.  Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[24]  LANDEl,et al.  THE GENETIC COVARIANCE BETWEEN CHARACTERS MAINTAINED BY PLEIOTROPIC MUTATIONS , 2003 .