Using willingness to pay to forecast the adoption of solar photovoltaics: A “parameterization + calibration” approach

Abstract Distributed energy resources, such as rooftop solar photovoltaics (PV), are likely to comprise a substantial fraction of new generation capacity in the United States. However, forecasting technology adoption based on people's willingness to pay (WTP) faces two major challenges: the stated-intention and omitted-variable biases. Previous solar adoption literature has neglected to address these two biases altogether. Here, we adopt a “parameterization + calibration” approach to address both biases and estimate customers’ WTP for PV. After collecting survey data on respondents’ WTP for adopting PV, we characterize its empirical cumulative density function using a gamma distribution. We further calibrate the gamma distribution parameters using a national distributed PV adoption simulation model, finding the parameters that produce the best fit between simulated and historic solar adoption. We then show that the calibrated gamma distribution improves the raw WTP data after correcting for the two biases. Finally, we use our optimally-calibrated WTP to forecast market demand for residential PV at the county-level of the United States in 2020. Improving estimates of customer willingness to pay has significant implications for policy directly, e.g. estimating the effect of a proposed policy on technology adoption, and other regulatory processes that use forecasting, e.g. integrated resource planning.

[1]  Chul-Yong Lee,et al.  Estimating willingness to pay for renewable energy in South Korea using the contingent valuation method , 2016 .

[2]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  Stated intentions and purchase behavior: A unified model ☆ , 2010 .

[3]  F. Strack,et al.  “Order Effects” in Survey Research: Activation and Information Functions of Preceding Questions , 1992 .

[4]  Todd L. Cherry,et al.  Willingness to pay for a Green Energy program: A comparison of ex-ante and ex-post hypothetical bias mitigation approaches , 2007 .

[5]  Shuiyuan Cheng,et al.  Willingness to pay for renewable electricity: A contingent valuation study in Beijing, China , 2014 .

[6]  Varun Rai,et al.  Diffusion of environmentally-friendly energy technologies: buy versus lease differences in residential PV markets , 2013 .

[7]  Kenneth Gillingham,et al.  Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[8]  T. Mai,et al.  Impacts of Federal Tax Credit Extensions on Renewable Deployment and Power Sector Emissions , 2016 .

[9]  Easan Drury,et al.  Diffusion into new markets: evolving customer segments in the solar photovoltaics market , 2015 .

[10]  Kenneth Gillingham,et al.  Spatial patterns of solar photovoltaic system adoption: The influence of neighbors and the built environment , 2015 .

[11]  Alvin J. Silk,et al.  On the reliability and predictive validity of purchase intention measures , 2011 .

[12]  Achla Marathe,et al.  Consumers' preference for renewable energy in the southwest USA , 2011 .

[13]  L. Stalans.  Frames, Framing Effects, and Survey Responses , 2012 .

[14]  Trieu Mai,et al.  Estimating the Value of Improved Distributed Photovoltaic Adoption Forecasts for Utility Resource Planning , 2018 .

[15]  Aidan O'Driscoll,et al.  The diffusion of microgeneration technologies – assessing the influence of perceived product characteristics on home owners' willingness to pay , 2011 .

[16]  Richard C. Ready,et al.  Preference heterogeneity for renewable energy technology , 2014 .

[17]  K. B. Monroe.  Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions , 1990 .

[18]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  Adjusting Stated Intention Measures to Predict Trial Purchase of New Products: A Comparison of Models and Methods , 1989 .

[19]  Giorgio Graditi,et al.  Comparative analysis of data-driven methods online and offline trained to the forecasting of grid-connected photovoltaic plant production , 2017 .

[20]  Bai-Chen Xie,et al.  Willingness to pay for green electricity in Tianjin, China: Based on the contingent valuation method , 2018 .

[21]  Carol L. Silva,et al.  Contingent Valuation and the Policymaking Process: An Application to Used Nuclear Fuel in the United States , 2016, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis.

[22]  Maksym Polyakov,et al.  Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Meta-Regression Analysis , 2015 .

[23]  Donna Heimiller,et al.  The transformation of southern California's residential photovoltaics market through third-party ownership , 2012 .

[24]  L. Friedman,et al.  Consumers' willingness to pay for renewable and nuclear energy: A comparative analysis between the US and Japan , 2015 .

[25]  Giorgio Graditi,et al.  Comparison of Photovoltaic plant power production prediction methods using a large measured dataset , 2016 .

[26]  Z. John Zhang,et al.  Augmenting Conjoint Analysis to Estimate Consumer Reservation Price , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[27]  M. Soskin,et al.  Homeowner willingness to pay for rooftop solar electricity generation , 2017 .

[28]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  Do Intentions Really Predict Behavior? Self-Generated Validity Effects in Survey Research , 2005 .

[29]  K. A. Smith.  Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel''s , 1998 .

[30]  F. Bass.  A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[31]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Valuating renewable microgeneration technologies in Lithuanian households: A study on willingness to pay , 2018 .

[32]  Ian Baring-Gould,et al.  Distributed Generation Market Demand Model (dGen): Documentation , 2016 .

[33]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  When Do Purchase Intentions Predict Sales? , 2006 .

[34]  Miltiadis Chalikias,et al.  Public Perceptions and Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Case Study from Greece , 2018 .

[35]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Impact of Different Economic Performance Metrics on the Perceived Value of Solar Photovoltaics , 2011 .

[36]  Albert C. Bemmaor,et al.  Predicting Behavior from Intention-to-Buy Measures: The Parametric Case , 1995 .

[37]  D. G. Morrison.  Purchase Intentions and Purchase Behavior , 1979 .

[38]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Predicting a changing taste: Do people know what they will like? , 1992 .

[39]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Modeling survey response bias – with an analysis of the demand for an advanced electronic device , 1998 .

[40]  Varun Rai,et al.  Determinants of Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Energy Technology Adoption: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach , 2014 .

[41]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Measuring Consumer Attitudes toward the Marketplace with Tailored Interviews , 1989 .

[42]  Wesley J. Cole,et al.  2020 Standard Scenarios Report: A U.S. Electricity Sector Outlook , 2016 .

[43]  Douglas L. MacLachlan,et al.  Estimating Willingness to Pay with Exaggeration Bias-Corrected Contingent Valuation Method , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[44]  Katrin Rehdanz,et al.  Consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity: A meta-analysis of the literature , 2015 .

[45]  R. Margolis,et al.  Overcoming barriers and uncertainties in the adoption of residential solar PV , 2016 .

[46]  G. Urban,et al.  Pre-Test-Market Evaluation of New Packaged Goods: A Model and Measurement Methodology , 1978 .

[47]  K. Willis,et al.  Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households' for micro-generation technologies , 2010 .

[48]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[49]  Yumin Li.  Incentive pass-through in the California Solar Initiative – An analysis based on third-party contracts , 2018, Energy Policy.